[citation][nom]aevm[/nom]--- "feel free to weigh in with any comments you might have about this new video format." ---Well, I think it's a bad idea. Some of us have caps, some times brutal (e.g. 25 GB/month) on Internet usage, and videos consume a lot more bandwidth than text + images.Some of us read these articles at work, when they really should be working. You can read an article with text + images without being obvious. If you have to put headphones on, it becomes obvious. Also, some of us reading these articles at work may not have a sound card at all in the computer, or it may be very low quality (e.g. I couldn't really hear what the model was saying). And finally, I personally prefer to read a page of text in a few seconds rather than wait for a model to read it for me in a few minutes. OK, if she's really pretty, I might spend the few minutes, but I can't afford to do that too much so I'll end up reading fewer articles. You will get fewer page hits that way.In conclusion, go ahead and use the videos, but add the text there as well.[/citation]
Check out the story that went live right next to this one on the front page. Tried to make sure we'd satisfy both camps today ;-)
Check out the story that went live right next to this one on the front page. Tried to make sure we'd satisfy both camps today ;-)