Wd red vs black

fireboy

Honorable
Sep 12, 2012
159
0
10,680
hi guy
i have was thinking of getting a HDD and i found that WD BLACK is a good 1 for gaming :)
but it is vey rare to find here 🙁 ..but i found alot of WD RED here.. the shopkeeper told me it is new model HDD
and better 1..here WD black is 32 KD (kuwait dinner) and red is 33 KD =both are 1 TB... 2TB RED rate is 37 KD was thinking of getting it.. 😀
but RED is found here mostly but i dont whether it is good for gaming or not ..
i can get BLACK too only 1 KD difference ..but i want a good HDD for gaming..cant effort SSD too expensive.. :bounce:
 
Is this going to be your primary drive or just simply a storage drive?

I would easily recommend the WD Black for gaming, simply because it is a 7200 RPM drive vs a 5400 RPM drive. WD Red is intended more for storage/NAS type setup. There are several articles you can read on the comparison between the drives, but this is the main point

Since both are only a difference of 1 KD... I would say go with the Black.
 
the black is more performance and the red is for storage. so for you what are looking for the black would be a better choice, though it can be a little noisy.
 


As mentioned above, thrice... go with the black.

The red one isn't 7200 RPM, WD doesn't advertise it directly as it mentions it's RPM is "Intellipower" but you can find the RPM in many places as it has been tested. Here is Tom's specs on the drives.

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/red-wd20efrx-wd30efrx-nas,3248-3.html
 
The Black drives are 7200RPM drives whereby the REDs are considered intellipower meaning that the rotation speeds may vary possibly from 5400 to 7200 if not less.
Besides you will get a 5yr warranty on the Blacks vs a 3yr on the Reds however I guess this may not mean much depending in what county one resides in.

Edit: Looks like JordoR beat me to the "submit" button - :)
 
Yes the blacks will generate a bit more heat because they are a performance drive. I currently have (2) 2 TB WD Blacks + (1) 1 TB Black in my case and have never experienced any unusually high temps on them.

Unless you live in a specifically very warm climate, with a very poorly ventilated case, in a poorly ventilated room... you should be alright. If you are really nervous, you can read up on the temps.
 
i forgot to mention here we get only 1 year warranty..here no online shop..🙁
very gaming material is too expensive ...128 GB SSD=45 KD(160.10 USD)..
dont ask about gaming motherboard ...all r FIRE if u go for OC..MB
 
As a system builder for 17 years I have seen the best and worst Hard Drives. From Quantums that would make your skin blister (Ran that Hot), and Maxtors that were junk.

WD's Redlines are designed for Raid systems but are dismal failures with a rate of 30-50% as of 30 days ago. Hitachi's once IBM's "deathstar" line have improved to take top notch in reliability but a small sample was used. Seagates would be an inexpensive way to go. For reliability in Gaming and regular desktops, Go with WD Black. I've onlyu had a couple fail to make warranty and 0 that went belly up completely. If your going with a raid system spend the extra $60 and get WD Black Enterprise as they are the most reliable raid drives with 0 failures before their 5 year warr out of about 30 I have installed. WD Reds are priced great but I wouldn't bet on even getting a live one to test.
 


What do you mean by WD Black Enterprise? Does that even exist?
 


I have the same question.

My configuration is SSD for boot and two mechanical drives for data storage in a RAID 1 configuration. Application is video rendering directly to the RAID array. I've used black drives in RAID 1 over the past several years without issue. Prefer 7200 RPM drives, but am intregued by the stability aspect of red drives. Wonder if I will really see a difference between them?
 
The biggest thing I've always noticed is the Black series has No-touch Ramp Load technology, so while they're warranted for 3 years Red, 5 years Black and likely go through similar quality control tests (possibly less for RED, as the constant heat and use will strongly increase its failure rate, I suspect they've cheeped out a bit on them to save costs to spend on the replacements, especially for government and top-tier support where for security reasons the defective drive is never returned or proven to be bad. Both have RAID optimizations, so unless your without AC or like it really hot the Red doesn't have any real advantage.

Otherwise the drives are virtually the same, minus the dynamic cache witch will likely help responsiveness with frequently changing non-repetitive tasks.

--If they only did what they should...add those two technology's to the red line, ever with the lower RPM....I'm sorry 5 tech's - multiple data processors, "CPT" to keep power-outages from stopping a critical file write before it finishes unloading from cache or the PSU catches back up with demand.. and #5... GIVE THE 2.5" versions the same amount of CACHE- NOT 16MB!

Even if they added the ram, it would be a close call - I'd say for my mom who refuses to use AC even when it's 130 F out.. Red might be better, but for me - it would need the no-touch tech which would tremendously reduce the ware and tear - so long as your not kicking it on a daily basis. less heat (even if they were 7200rpms - from the reduced size) and the immensely increased shock resistance (times 2 with no-touch) would give me huge faith.
--And with today's FIOS and google ISP, cable models with 10mbit/s uploads, and unlimited cloud storage for $60 a year, I would probably let it be stripped only, unless it utilized the extra drive to increase read speeds, then it would probably be worth it, since the drives max at 1TB each and we'd be talking about a 4-7,

===[ Slight add-on about the drives I chose for y last desktop --possibly more drives if I can find my really expensive PCI-E card in either storage or my pc at my dads place (to big for a plane trip). I saved up a good amount of time for that 3 or 4 years ago,1 or 2 GB DDR 2 or 3 cache? 16 connectors, SATA or SAS compatible but registers as a SCSI card (gotta love the reduced CPU usage) and a 4x SSD RAID w/ integrated ECC for a windows only ]--drive. Petty I almost never got the chance to use it before my injury. It sounds so antiquated now - but back then I opted for 4x 600GB WD Raptors and 4x 2TB for low-access archives. now most my drives have died and I'm forced to use unlimited cloud storage. before my last non-redounds die from the click of death... ]===

I hope your Drive array worked out well for you though! This small rant was more a draft for my blog and hopefully helpful info for others that find this on google/bing

(I try for Bing - for the free prizes, but it fails to find any results for many searches, even Microsoft ones - while google gives massive results for, and I always avoided google because before being bought alltheweb.com had at least 3-5 times as many pages indexed. I strongly miss that search engine- but now it seems I have free Hulu for life).

--IMHO: Black is a far better drive then Red/Red Pro in 4-5 ways, listed all on WD's website:

I'll leave one quote from WD's website as a final thought: Why the (Frell) is this not in any Red Edition HDD, When it should more likely be excluded from the Blacks and in every Red?!

"The recording head never touches the disk media ensuring significantly less wear to the recording head and media as well as better drive protection in transit."