What AMD processors don't bottleneck an r9 290x?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Jack Field

Reputable
May 6, 2015
8
0
4,510
I am creating this thread to ask for a list of AMD processors that are powerful enough to run 1 r9 290x. If possible can you list the AMD processors in price order.

Thanks.
 
Solution
The real answer's a lot more difficult here, as there's no hard-and-fast measure.

Simply put, it's 100% application specific; each game can place a different load on each machine's parts. Some games are much heavier on the GPU than the CPU, and others vice-versa. So it'd be useful to know what applications (games) you'd like to run are.

While it's often-repeated truth that the Core i5s offer much better gaming performance than AMD FX CPUs, citing that as an answer is shortsighted twofold: for one, the asker may already have an AMD motherboard, so once you throw in the cost of a brand-new Intel motherboard, the benefit may not be worth the purchase price. Secondly, the benefit may not be that great at all, depending upon the...

gonf

Distinguished
Jun 17, 2008
300
0
18,860
i know this is also off topic too. but take a look at this video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p7_ZiVY8vwE
the FreeSync is free to monitor manufacturers. so the newer monitor should support it without price going up for crazy.
if Tearing,V-sync,stuttering is that important to you. just get a new monitor.
even tho I never seem.

I stand with my point. 1 video card it doesn't matter that much AMD or Intel, 2 video card and more. go for the Intel i7. forget about the i5. it kinda point less. and a i3? thats even more of a joke.

AMD = If you want to play with your computer settings go for it. The time you use to do the OC will worth much more to get a real job for 10 buk an hrs and use that money to get the i7. but hey for a computer guy. the chance to work with a computer to OC is priceless. for everything else there is Intel LOL "most of the Benchmarks you see online are FX8350 at 4.2ghz and not at 5.7ghz."
Intel = If you don't want to play with the setting and it will just do the job. go for it
 

crispytheone

Reputable
Mar 9, 2015
150
0
4,710
I think its a bit different, cause its not really the CPU but the whole architecture of the system is slower, so the I5 will beat it with a r7 250 and an R9 290x, but they both will scale up and produce fantastic results, and you will see the FX-8350 never stop gaining, thats not a bottleneck, thats just a slower and older architecture.

 

RobCrezz

Expert
Ambassador


Clearly the gpu is unable to output the same fps because the cpu cant keep up - That is a cpu bottleneck.

Dont get be wrong, im not knocking the amd cpu, but this is fact, that is exactly what a bottleneck is.
 

RobCrezz

Expert
Ambassador








At least we arent alone.
 

gonf

Distinguished
Jun 17, 2008
300
0
18,860
wait.

so let say

Game X with same GPU
CPU A gets 60FPS
CPU B gets 58FPS

but in Game Y with same GPU
CPU A gets 58FPS
CPU B get 60FPS

what do you call that?
bottlenecking on both CPU LOL
 
There is always a bottleneck, it comes to the point of how drastic it is. Whether its from a cpu or gpu it doesnt matter there are other places a bottleneck can come from other than those, but those are just the biggest ones. gonf's example is good as games are coded differently and ur not going to get same performance accross the board. There is always a margin of error, and somewhere performance is being held back
 

LookItsRain

Distinguished


Clearly not a bottlneck if the difference is within the margin of error.
AMD has sometimes 20 less fps, thats just looking at averages not mins
 

nottheking

Distinguished
Jan 5, 2006
1,456
0
19,310
The real answer's a lot more difficult here, as there's no hard-and-fast measure.

Simply put, it's 100% application specific; each game can place a different load on each machine's parts. Some games are much heavier on the GPU than the CPU, and others vice-versa. So it'd be useful to know what applications (games) you'd like to run are.

While it's often-repeated truth that the Core i5s offer much better gaming performance than AMD FX CPUs, citing that as an answer is shortsighted twofold: for one, the asker may already have an AMD motherboard, so once you throw in the cost of a brand-new Intel motherboard, the benefit may not be worth the purchase price. Secondly, the benefit may not be that great at all, depending upon the application in question. And of course, the SETTINGS also place a huge impact, too: it's very easy to crank settings up and down to adjust the load on the GPU... But not so much can be done to impact the load on the CPU in most cases.

As a couple of examples, at the extreme GPU-heavy end, we have things like ARMA 3: If you're enjoying it on its mouth-watering Ultra settings, your CPU largely doesn't really matter: your "mere" 290X is liable to be dragged down unless you've cut the resolution a good deal.

At the opposite end are games like Battlefield 4, or especially a lot of strategy games: your CPU can make a FAR bigger difference in those. Or to speak of an older game... Skyrim, for instance, if heavily modded, can present a load almost entirely on the CPU; by now video cards that are positively ancient could handle it fine, but even a decent CPU could get bogged down.

Long story short, it hinges on what you want to play. Adjusting your graphics settings, it's actually possible to get a balanced load with just about any reasonable CPU and your video card. It's just a matter of making it so that balance is a place you're happy with. Chances are, however, that even a less-expensive Vishera chip like, say, the FX-8320, will get plenty enough playable performance in modern games. If you feel like you'd want to bump it a little more, go for a FX-8350. Neither will reach a higher-end i5, but you're not going to be able to reach that level. Fortunately, things should still be plenty playable nonetheless.
 
Solution

JohnDR

Reputable
Jan 3, 2015
21
0
4,510
Well, if you have water cooling, then you can OC your FX-8350 . Then bottlenecks from the CPU are less of an issue. I've boosted my FX-8370 from 4.3 GHz to 4.9 GHz just by using a Corsair H105.
Bottlenecks during gaming from an outdated AMD chipset, or HDD usage instead of an SSD for gaming, or not having fast enough or large enough DDR3 RAM are all issues that effect performance you should consider as well.