jeff77789 Distinguished Jun 24, 2009 198 0 18,690 Jun 2, 2011 #1 In terms of graphics performance, is the performance better, equal to, or worse than other, more expensive, non-gaming laptops around $500-$1000 ? i know that the processing power of the amd chip itself is close to what an intel atom can push out
In terms of graphics performance, is the performance better, equal to, or worse than other, more expensive, non-gaming laptops around $500-$1000 ? i know that the processing power of the amd chip itself is close to what an intel atom can push out
Solution rwpritchett Jun 2, 2011 The Zacate HD6310 video is about on par with an HD5450 for graphics performance. The CPU is a little slower than an AMD Athlon X2 3600+. Here's some benchmarks of my own E-350 CPU: 1M SuperPi = 49.562 sec GPU: 3DMark03 = 6364 It is not faster than a notebook with an i5 and GTX 460M. Not by a longshot.
The Zacate HD6310 video is about on par with an HD5450 for graphics performance. The CPU is a little slower than an AMD Athlon X2 3600+. Here's some benchmarks of my own E-350 CPU: 1M SuperPi = 49.562 sec GPU: 3DMark03 = 6364 It is not faster than a notebook with an i5 and GTX 460M. Not by a longshot.
jeff77789 Distinguished Jun 24, 2009 198 0 18,690 Jun 2, 2011 #2 what about desktops? its worse than an i5-gtx 460M right? Upvote 0 Downvote
rwpritchett Splendid Mar 17, 2006 3,159 1 21,865 Jun 2, 2011 Solution #3 The Zacate HD6310 video is about on par with an HD5450 for graphics performance. The CPU is a little slower than an AMD Athlon X2 3600+. Here's some benchmarks of my own E-350 CPU: 1M SuperPi = 49.562 sec GPU: 3DMark03 = 6364 It is not faster than a notebook with an i5 and GTX 460M. Not by a longshot. Upvote 0 Downvote Solution
The Zacate HD6310 video is about on par with an HD5450 for graphics performance. The CPU is a little slower than an AMD Athlon X2 3600+. Here's some benchmarks of my own E-350 CPU: 1M SuperPi = 49.562 sec GPU: 3DMark03 = 6364 It is not faster than a notebook with an i5 and GTX 460M. Not by a longshot.
jeff77789 Distinguished Jun 24, 2009 198 0 18,690 Jun 2, 2011 #4 both graphics and processing power wise? Upvote 0 Downvote
rwpritchett Splendid Mar 17, 2006 3,159 1 21,865 Jun 2, 2011 #5 Yes, both graphics and processing power-wise the E350 is weak sauce compared to a mobile i5 and 460M. The 460M gets about 34000 on 3DMark03. The desktop version of the i5 (i5-2500) does SuperPi 1M in about 10 seconds. Upvote 0 Downvote
Yes, both graphics and processing power-wise the E350 is weak sauce compared to a mobile i5 and 460M. The 460M gets about 34000 on 3DMark03. The desktop version of the i5 (i5-2500) does SuperPi 1M in about 10 seconds.
jeff77789 Distinguished Jun 24, 2009 198 0 18,690 Jun 2, 2011 #6 oh ok mine does it in about 25 seconds (phenom II 955 3.5ghz) Upvote 0 Downvote
jeff77789 Distinguished Jun 24, 2009 198 0 18,690 Jun 2, 2011 #7 Best answer selected by jeff77789. Upvote 0 Downvote
Mousemonkey Titan Sep 3, 2006 59,462 17 92,965 Jun 2, 2011 #8 This topic has been closed by Mousemonkey Upvote 0 Downvote