Tom's Hardware and other media sites are always making lists. Especially what is the best CPU to spend hard earned money on.
This question should help Tom's writers to better define these cpu's as consumers should determine what is important to them.
Intel sells cpu's the same way that Detroit used to sell cars. Intel is always trying to push the fastest and best performing silicon on to the consumer. Yet these cpu's like the cars sold by Detroit all had flaws that put the public at risk. Cars were poorly designed and unsafe.
Intel silicon is also poorly designed and unsafe. There is always a new vulnerability that exposes the consumer to malicious attack and loss of data.
Yet these vulnerabilities do not appear to cause any sense of outrage by the online media!
What good is the best performing CPU if it can not secure your data and passwords?
What good is producing so-called firmware "fixes" that never get applied or used during benchmarks?
This question should help Tom's writers to better define these cpu's as consumers should determine what is important to them.
Intel sells cpu's the same way that Detroit used to sell cars. Intel is always trying to push the fastest and best performing silicon on to the consumer. Yet these cpu's like the cars sold by Detroit all had flaws that put the public at risk. Cars were poorly designed and unsafe.
Intel silicon is also poorly designed and unsafe. There is always a new vulnerability that exposes the consumer to malicious attack and loss of data.
Yet these vulnerabilities do not appear to cause any sense of outrage by the online media!
What good is the best performing CPU if it can not secure your data and passwords?
What good is producing so-called firmware "fixes" that never get applied or used during benchmarks?