junkeymonkey :
ya , I see where that xeon at 3.7 is going to really hurt me over that i7 at 3.9 --come on
and why eave from here at toms they get recommended and at like at newegg reviews its mostly gamers that reviewed them on like there z boards ??
example
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819116906
First, you picked the lowest i7 to compare to your mid-level Xeon -hardly a fair comparison. So, going with the fastest i7 vs fastest Xeon - the i7-4790k has a BASE of 4.0, with turbo set of 2/3/4/4 which means with 4 cores = 4.2, 3 cores = 4.3, and 2 or 1 core = 4.4 ghz.
The fastest E3 Xeon (1286 v3) has a base of 3.7 with turbo states of 2/3/4/4 which means with 4 cores active = 3.9ghz, 3 cores = 4.0, 2 cores = 4.1, and 1 core = 4.1. At that point it's giving up 300mhz of speed - or about 8% SLOWER than the i7, and this isn't even touching on overclocking as all these turbo states are based on thermal headroom. Pick a better air cooler than stock, or even good water cooling, and the CPU can maintain it's higher boost states longer, not to mention if you OC it, you can hit a consistent 4.7ghz easy on all 4 cores.
That's significantly faster than what the Xeon can hit as they will not overclock.
Pricewise, the fastest Xeon E3 V3 I could find was the E3-1276-V3 @ $360.00, while the fastest i7-4790k came up at $340.00 - about $20 cheaper. I'm sure if you could find the top of the line 1286-V3, it would be a bit higher still than the 1276.
Any way you break it down, the Xeons are going to be slightly declocked i7's - that's the only way they can be rated to run 24/7 like they are. They won't be faster (unless you go with a different motherboard and the higher core counts), but comparing equal cores and comparable rating levels - the consumer parts will be faster because they DON'T run 24/7 at full tilt.
Does that mean the Xeons are bad? Nope. Does that mean you can't use them for gaming? Nope. The consumer i7's will be slightly faster and slightly cheaper though.