What Nvidia Had to Say About Larrabee's Delay

Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
Status
Not open for further replies.
Would have been nice to see Intel compete in GPUs for all our sake since it should have driven prices down and innovation and performance up. Boo
 
[citation][nom]roofus[/nom]i expected more showmanship for the green team. its early though..[/citation]

LOL

Since when have Intel and Nvidia respected eachother?! Are you aware of the chipset war between them right now?!
 
This failure in part of Intel might give AMD its chance to shine if it actually attempts to exploit it.. Nvidia can also go with its "x86" processor and make a combined core as well..
 
Such a small comment...the article has more references to what AMD said then Nvidia, and all of it was already in yesterday's piece.
Dig more, journalists!
 
[citation][nom]scook9[/nom]LOLSince when have Intel and Nvidia respected eachother?! Are you aware of the chipset war between them right now?![/citation]

I even typed it slow for better comprehension and of course somebody didn't get it. What you are saying makes my point. I expected some fur to fly and their response was relatively tame. Nvidia usually makes very harsh comments towards Intel and this was weak going by their previous banterings.
 
Intel would have becomed to powerfull. All the oem's would be forced to use their chip, killing Nvidia and AMD in one blow. Intel can underprice both away if they ever succeed.

And we know what happens next.
 
Intel would have becomed to powerfull. All the oem's would be forced to use their chip, killing Nvidia and AMD in one blow. Intel can underprice both away if they ever succeed.

And we know what happens next.
 
"The fact that a company with Intel's technical prowess and financial resources has struggled so hard to succeed with parallel computing shows just how exceptionally difficult a challenge this is," said Victor Martinez, a spokesman for Nvidia.
Click to expand...

This would be the only thing related to the title of this article. The rest is taken from earlier article about what AMD had to say.. C'mon guys, you get paid by article or what?
 
[citation][nom]thedipper[/nom]"Making a parallel computing chip is hard, says Nvidia."
Apparently so is making their current-gen GPU.[/citation]

Agreed, its been 18-months since NVIDIA realeased a new GPU chipset. They couldn't even scale-down their GTS-200 for over a year (turn-off does not equal scale-down i.e. 280 -> 260).

Nvidia, who single-handedly shut-down 3DFx (before buying them), has run into a wall trying to introduce a new architecture, what made Intel think it could duct-tape a bunch of Pentium Pros together and call it a GPU? Sorry Intel, you missed the train when you let AMD buy ATI. You've now pissed off Nvidia with your ridiculous chipset licensing, so who does that leave? Matrox? SGI? I doubt Intel will ever be a player in the commercial GPU after-market.
 
[citation][nom]Zoonie[/nom]This would be the only thing related to the title of this article. The rest is taken from earlier article about what AMD had to say.. C'mon guys, you get paid by article or what?[/citation]

From the way he double spaced nearly every sentence, maybe he gets paid by the page. All this for one lame quote...
 
[citation][nom]scook9[/nom]LOLSince when have Intel and Nvidia respected eachother?! Are you aware of the chipset war between them right now?![/citation]
He said shownmanship, not sportsmanship. That means he expected them to create a bolder statement or maybe another cartoon or soemthing.
 
ha ha ha anyone else a redman? AMD KNYUKKA's!!!!!

seriuosly though amd has been the only one innovating now a days i mean in both graphics AND cpu arenas. i7 = better use of phenom architecture, multicore, 64bit, the list goes on but needless to say they are the only ones that can laugh at intel now nvidia cant even complete their gpu on time.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts

Moderators online

Share this page

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom