I have 3 Seagate 3tb drives that failed SMART. They were in a raid and I reformatted them for regular use. They seem fine other than that....would I be able to use them for anything or would that be too risky?
Middle drive has failed. Don't use it anymore.
Drives with pending sectors - you have to resolve those sectors. You can do that with MHDD (scan with relocate option). http://hddguru.com/software/2005.10.02-MHDD/
Supposedly Seatools for DOS can do that also.
3 TB drives in particular are infamous for 'heading south' at an elevated rate compared to 1-2 TB drives, or even 4 -12 TB drives....
YOu can keep an eye on reallocated sectors, and when count starts to elevate (as is typical if a drive suffers a slight head crash), don't be surrpised, and, don't count on the drive for storage of anything other than that which can be easily redownloaded. (disposable videos, etc..)
Hello ser_renely, the best way to test a drive is use the proprietary software for them. For Seagate drives it is Seatools. SMART values do not always paint a clear picture of the health of a drive as Seagate does not publish attributes and thresholds. Therefore those results should be taken with a grain of salt. If after running the test it does not come up with any errors, then the drive is fine to use.
Middle drive has failed. Don't use it anymore.
Drives with pending sectors - you have to resolve those sectors. You can do that with MHDD (scan with relocate option). http://hddguru.com/software/2005.10.02-MHDD/
Supposedly Seatools for DOS can do that also.
If you are in a RAID 5, I'd advise getting any needed data to another external drive before attempting resilvering with a drive replacement, the stress of which often causes another failure in a 2nd drive, losing all data at that point.
Middle drive has failed. Don't use it anymore.
Drives with pending sectors - you have to resolve those sectors. You can do that with MHDD (scan with relocate option). http://hddguru.com/software/2005.10.02-MHDD/
Supposedly Seatools for DOS can do that also.