voiidwulf :
Yeah, that is true. Back in 2005 - 2008 I was fully console and probably made fun of PC gamers.
I was meaning at this point, excluding emulators, Xbox 360 and PS3 have no advantages over PC other than cost. Wii at least has some other stuff.
I am not trying to start a war or anything. I was just stating my opinion.
Not sure how you can exclude an emulator when the emulator in question is better than the console in most cases. You'll have to explain what it is that the Wii can do that Dolphin can't do, at several times the resolution.
I know you're not trying to start a war, I just disagree with your assertion. I'm not calling you an idiot or anything. Just interested in you qualifying your opinion. From where I sit specifically, Xbox360 PS3 and Wii all have the same "advantage" over PC; exclusive titles. Discounting those exclusives, neither of the 3 consoles offers anything that can't be had in better form on the PC. Albeit, to experience the Wii on PC you need an emulator, but that emulator isn't illegal, is free, and you can run still purchase and play retail games with it.
Retrowire :
My PS3 died 2 yrs ago, my 360 died last month. My NES, SNES, N64, GCN, Wii, Wii U, NDS, GBA are all I've got left. And they're all in perfect working condition. I credit this durability to Nintendo's "Seasoned Hardware" philosophy. That term is used in the book Super Mario, written by Jeff Ryan. It's a great book documenting the beginnings of Nintendo all the way up to the Wii.
Anyway, the "Seasoned Hardware" philosophy is the ethic of always using technology that has been around for sometime and therefore perfected. It's the reason Nintendo consoles stay somewhat behind the technological curve, yet last longer and have a lower fail rate. I think that's an interesting design ethic, what do you guys think?
The same can be said for SEGA's old consoles. Same with their controllers. Both Nintendo and SEGA (as well as Sony during the PS1 era) made controllers that have lasted through year after year of abuse. It's hard to get an xbox360 controller to last the better part of 1 year without a button starting to fail or an analog stick wearing out. I think it's likely a result of, over the years, it becoming apparent how much garbage gamers are willing to put up with.
During the early console days, they still weren't a proven money maker and there wasn't the assumed guarantee that gamers would buy anything you put in front of them, so SEGA and Nintendo felt compelled to design the best hardware they possibly could, with the best materials available to them. Nowadays, with the advent and proliferation of the internet it's not hard to do a quick scan of every gaming forum on the net and see that when someone's controller or console dies out, what is their most common response? To buy another one of the same brand. "Damn had to buy another Xbox360 controller mine died!" Honestly, the reason console hardware and peripheral quality is diminishing is because it's obvious that gamers have no reservations about, or sense of, responsible consumerism in the slightest.
edit- quick addition, I get what you're saying about the "tried and true" but slightly older hardware, but it's a bit fallacious in this case. The components that cause the 360 to fail for example are often not something that was new technology when the console was developed. The simple mechanical aspects of it die. It's a fate that can equally befall a Wii for example, but presumably doesn't as often because the Wii is simply assembled better.