My small office network has 53 needed ports to hook up. I bought a 48-port switch. One port of the 48 must connect the router, leaving 47 ports open on the switch.
53-47 = 6 left to find homes for.
I also have 4 access points not considered in the 53. And those need PoE. So I bought an 8-port PoE switch.
1 port of this switch must be used to connect to the router.
7 ports - 4 (access points) = 3 open ports.
6 ports left to find homes for, - 3 ports on the PoE switch still leave 3 ports that need to find homes.
(1) Do I want to replace the 8-port PoE switch with a 16-port PoE switch, for an extra $60 over a standard switch, just to keep the number of switches to a minimum of two?
(2) Instead, do I want to buy an 8-port standard switch and after taking one port for the router, I will have 7 open ports. And then put all non-PoE ports on standard switches? This would add a third switch to the router.
I read once that having a lot of switches will degrade network performance. Do I need to worry about network performance in either of these scenarios?
Thanks.
53-47 = 6 left to find homes for.
I also have 4 access points not considered in the 53. And those need PoE. So I bought an 8-port PoE switch.
1 port of this switch must be used to connect to the router.
7 ports - 4 (access points) = 3 open ports.
6 ports left to find homes for, - 3 ports on the PoE switch still leave 3 ports that need to find homes.
(1) Do I want to replace the 8-port PoE switch with a 16-port PoE switch, for an extra $60 over a standard switch, just to keep the number of switches to a minimum of two?
(2) Instead, do I want to buy an 8-port standard switch and after taking one port for the router, I will have 7 open ports. And then put all non-PoE ports on standard switches? This would add a third switch to the router.
I read once that having a lot of switches will degrade network performance. Do I need to worry about network performance in either of these scenarios?
Thanks.
Last edited: