Which is cheaper: refill inks or compatibles?

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)

"zakezuke" <zakezuke_us@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1123654554.260088.108520@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>> But is the cost of the printer really $100.00 or is it more like $50.00?
>
> Valid point... one could
>
> 1. Just buy a head $60ish
> 2. just buy a printer, toss the old printer $100ish +/- $20 for the
> ip4000
> 3. Buy printer, sell OEM ink $8.00 each would be fair...$80ish +/-
> $20 Toss old printer
> 4. Buy printer, sell OEM ink and old printer. $8/each fair or $40 and
> $35 in misc parts. $50ish to you +/- $20
>
> This is assuming that head clogging is an issue... which well I haven't
> seen it yet.
>
> Still that was beyond the point of my analysis, which was whether it
> would be a loss if your printer went kauput after the 2nd refill. It's
> close... if we were talking a 6 cart printer I would have little doubt
> depending on the model and cost of replacement. On a 5 printer....
> it's close... but by the 3rd refill your totally home free, you can
> trash that printer, the warranty could be expired, but you saved so
> much it doesn't matter. While I am critical of the userfriendlyness of
> the MIS kit... seriously they should go for some nice caps with
> threaded locks for the blunt needles rather that syrenges... it costs
> less from the get go.
>
> While there are some valid reasons for going OEM... I don't see many
> for the freaking canon who's OEM ink isn't really all that great in
> terms of lightfastness. It's my hope in the future that OEMs will see
> this trend and either lower their prices by a fator of at least 50%, or
> for the price they are asking offer archivial inks.

Zake, the eternal optimist! Both would be nice. I don't foresee Canon
lowering their ink prices because the majority of people who buy inkjet
printers simply buy the same brand ink at their nearby big-box office supply
or computer store. It is, essentially, a captive market for most consumers.
They may work up the nerve to try the aftermarket products these stores
carry, but there isn't much financial incentive as the prices of these
products is anywhere from just a few dollars less to sometimes more costly
than the OEM product. Often, these retail-outlet aftermarket ink carts give
less than satisfactory results and drive the consumer back to OEM inks.
Canon now claims to have more archival inks in their newest printers, but
I'd like to see independant testing before accepting their projection of
print stability.
>
 
Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)

Keep jerking your chain and supporting the whores.

drc023 wrote:

>Once again the figures stated are very conservative as to savings vs.
>replacement cost of the printer. IP4000's are available in the $100.00 range
>+/- a few $ depending on the source. But is the cost of the printer really
>$100.00 or is it more like $50.00? If the value of the Canon ink tanks is
>subtracted from the total price, then the printer is only about $50.00,
>which is less than the cost of a replacement print head. Based upon this,
>the payback is barely over one refill instead of two. Therefore, the
>question for our resident troll is why does it only have to be high volume
>users to justify refilling? Every time a complete refill is done, enough
>money is saved to purchase a new iP4000 (if the value of the OEM tanks is
>factored in) and even if not, two complete refills will save the equivalent
>purchase cost of a new printer.
>
>
 
Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)

*Preaching to the Choir*

zakezuke wrote:

>>But is the cost of the printer really $100.00 or is it more like $50.00?
>>
>>
>
>Valid point... one could
>
>1. Just buy a head $60ish
>2. just buy a printer, toss the old printer $100ish +/- $20 for the
>ip4000
>3. Buy printer, sell OEM ink $8.00 each would be fair...$80ish +/-
>$20 Toss old printer
>4. Buy printer, sell OEM ink and old printer. $8/each fair or $40 and
>$35 in misc parts. $50ish to you +/- $20
>
>This is assuming that head clogging is an issue... which well I haven't
>seen it yet.
>
>Still that was beyond the point of my analysis, which was whether it
>would be a loss if your printer went kauput after the 2nd refill. It's
>close... if we were talking a 6 cart printer I would have little doubt
>depending on the model and cost of replacement. On a 5 printer....
>it's close... but by the 3rd refill your totally home free, you can
>trash that printer, the warranty could be expired, but you saved so
>much it doesn't matter. While I am critical of the userfriendlyness of
>the MIS kit... seriously they should go for some nice caps with
>threaded locks for the blunt needles rather that syrenges... it costs
>less from the get go.
>
>While there are some valid reasons for going OEM... I don't see many
>for the freaking canon who's OEM ink isn't really all that great in
>terms of lightfastness. It's my hope in the future that OEMs will see
>this trend and either lower their prices by a fator of at least 50%, or
>for the price they are asking offer archivial inks.
>
>
>
 
Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)

Burt wrote:

>"zakezuke" <zakezuke_us@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:1123654554.260088.108520@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>>>But is the cost of the printer really $100.00 or is it more like $50.00?
>>>
>>>
>>Valid point... one could
>>
>>1. Just buy a head $60ish
>>2. just buy a printer, toss the old printer $100ish +/- $20 for the
>>ip4000
>>3. Buy printer, sell OEM ink $8.00 each would be fair...$80ish +/-
>>$20 Toss old printer
>>4. Buy printer, sell OEM ink and old printer. $8/each fair or $40 and
>>$35 in misc parts. $50ish to you +/- $20
>>
>>This is assuming that head clogging is an issue... which well I haven't
>>seen it yet.
>>
>>Still that was beyond the point of my analysis, which was whether it
>>would be a loss if your printer went kauput after the 2nd refill. It's
>>close... if we were talking a 6 cart printer I would have little doubt
>>depending on the model and cost of replacement. On a 5 printer....
>>it's close... but by the 3rd refill your totally home free, you can
>>trash that printer, the warranty could be expired, but you saved so
>>much it doesn't matter. While I am critical of the userfriendlyness of
>>the MIS kit... seriously they should go for some nice caps with
>>threaded locks for the blunt needles rather that syrenges... it costs
>>less from the get go.
>>
>>While there are some valid reasons for going OEM... I don't see many
>>for the freaking canon who's OEM ink isn't really all that great in
>>terms of lightfastness. It's my hope in the future that OEMs will see
>>this trend and either lower their prices by a fator of at least 50%, or
>>for the price they are asking offer archivial inks.
>>
>>
>
>Zake, the eternal optimist! Both would be nice. I don't foresee Canon
>lowering their ink prices because the majority of people who buy inkjet
>printers simply buy the same brand ink at their nearby big-box office supply
>or computer store.
>

A LOT SMARTER THAN YOU OLD FART

> It is, essentially, a captive market for most consumers.
>They may work up the nerve to try the aftermarket products these stores
>carry, but there isn't much financial incentive as the prices of these
>products is anywhere from just a few dollars less to sometimes more costly
>than the OEM product. Often, these retail-outlet aftermarket ink carts give
>less than satisfactory results and drive the consumer back to OEM inks.
>Canon now claims to have more archival inks in their newest printers, but
>I'd like to see independant testing before accepting their projection of
>print stability.
>
>
>
>
>
>
 
Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)

Then again, let's see how far a car can go on 4-12 ml of gasoline...

Art

zakezuke wrote:

>>Everyone keeps crying about the price of oil per barrel. Has anyone calculated
>>the price of OEM ink "per barrel"? Close to a million dollars? Can someone
>>do the math here. I can't, it's too early in the morning. Anyway, my cyan just
>>flashed that it's low. Time to buy a new printer!
>
>
> Nah, only low end lexmarks cost a million dollars/barrel, and even then
> it's only the color ink that costs that much. We are talking about a
> product that sells for thousands of dollars a gallon, where $2000 is
> the bottom of the barrel so to speak, $5000 is somewhat average, and
> $10,000/gal is spendy.
>
> What is the volume of liquid an oil barrel? Is it 42gal or 55gal? I
> think it's 42gal or 158.984 liters.
>
> Burt pointed out I was wrong on the BCI-6 volume. I thought 15ml, he
> says 14ml.
>
> -USD-
> Canon BCI-6 158,984 ml ($11.50/14ml) = $130,594
> Canon BCI-3e 158,984 ml ($13.00/25ml) = $82,671.68
>
> Epson T048x20 color (not black) 158,984 ml ($11.50/13ml) =$140,117.77
> epson T048120 black (yes black) 158,984 ml ($17.00/14ml) =$193,052.00
>
> Lexmark 10N0016 (#16) black 158,984 ml ($33.00/16ml) = $398,169.75
> Lexmark 10N0026 (#26) color 158,984 ml ($35.00/*5ml) = $1,112,888.00
>
> *15.5ml total volume for 3 colors for the high yield color #25 cart.
>
> So... we now know the price of ink per barrel costs more than cars.
> The cost may or may not be equal to a house depending on your market.
>
 
Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)

> Then again, let's see how far a car can go on 4-12 ml of gasoline...

50 feet to 130 feet in theory.. in practice, might be enough to get the
engine to turn over.

But a potato...a potato can travel about 50 yards on just 4ml of
gasoline. Further. on 4ml of gasoline a potato can pass through a car,
or at least a honda. I've not seen a potato survive 12ml of gasoline,
but the potato mash spread out a good 33 feet.