Question Which of these two combinations is better for this price?

[psaez84]

Hi, I'm considering to build a computer for multipurpose, navigating, casual gaming, play movies, video editing, photo editing, office, etc...

The computer must have at least 1TB of SSD and a 24" monitor. These are the two main options I have composed:

8500G vs 693 = https://www.pccomponentes.com/configurador/5cBe3eE52
5600G vs 578 = https://www.pccomponentes.com/configurador/824eEf8e6

The first one will last more years for sure, but the second one is cheaper. Both will work for current use.

Do you see anything wrong in any of the combinations, or are the components fully compatible?

Do you find a better combination for less price?

Is the 115 € extra expense justified?

Will all fit in that micro atx case?

Does exist an "all in one" pc monitor with all integrated inside better option than those for a similar price? Or will always be worse for being all in one?

Thank you

 

[DSzymborski]

The first one is the better one.

Even on a PC with no GPU, that power supply is absolutely frightening, to the extent that it would be a dealbreaker for me with any PC at any price.

 

[psaez84]

The first one is the better one.

Even on a PC with no GPU, that power supply is absolutely frightening, to the extent that it would be a dealbreaker for me with any PC at any price.

Which is the cheapest PS you can see in that website that it's gives you a minimum of security to purchase?

I searched Active PFC and found that one with Active PFC, i thought was decent

 

[DSzymborski]

"Active PFC" is a bare minimum. It's like a car advertising "glass windows."

https://www.pccomponentes.com/msi-mag-a550bn-550w-80-plus-bronze

This is the least expensive option on that site that I wouldn't charge someone to take off their their hands and drop off at a recycling center.