Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)
They may have been replaced due to the need or desire for faster models,
or improved printing characteristics or ink types available.
Art
Just Allan wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 17:16:01 GMT, "DSphotog"
> <dsmith5knot@optonline.net> wrote:
>
>
>>Not to pick a nit or anything, but don't you have your Dye and Pigment a bit
>>confused.
>
>
> You weren't nitpicking. (Neither was I by the way - the simple fact
> is, his logic doesn't hold water.) Obviously the printers DID have a
> day of trouble, or they wouldn't have been replaced by 7, 6, 5, 4, 3,
> 2, 1 - new printers.
They may have been replaced due to the need or desire for faster models,
or improved printing characteristics or ink types available.
Art
Just Allan wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 17:16:01 GMT, "DSphotog"
> <dsmith5knot@optonline.net> wrote:
>
>
>>Not to pick a nit or anything, but don't you have your Dye and Pigment a bit
>>confused.
>
>
> You weren't nitpicking. (Neither was I by the way - the simple fact
> is, his logic doesn't hold water.) Obviously the printers DID have a
> day of trouble, or they wouldn't have been replaced by 7, 6, 5, 4, 3,
> 2, 1 - new printers.
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram