[citation][nom]Houndsteeth[/nom]Um, OK...though I thought OS X was based on FreeBSD, and even that, on the Mach 5 Kernel. And when last I checked, FreeBSD was NOT Linux. And yes, they have supplied quite a bit to the OSS community. Webkit development for one, as well as a lot of underlayer compatibility between different networking protocols. Sure, they don't headline any big projects, but the base OS without the GUI and application layers is available for free (as OpenDarwin), and Apple developers are key players to a lot of OSS development efforts, from direct involvement in projects, to contributing through testing and submitting patches.By the way, not to pick nits, but it is Mac, short for Macintosh, and not MAC, which stands for Machine Address Code and is key for several networking topologies. Just want to make sure you know the distinction.When I purchase a new work machine from Apple, I always purchase the base unit with as much processor as I can afford. I add in RAM and hard drives myself, and I have discovered that I get a lot more machine for my dollar that way. Anyone who would just buy a configured box from ANY integrator (not just Apple, but Dell and HP too) is just asking to get charged a premium. If I could order the machine without RAM and a hard drive, I would.For your information, you can add any PC video card you want to to the Mac Pro. When you boot into Windows, you can then use that video card to play whatever video game you want to as long as you load the appropriate drivers. Sure, you aren't going to set up a crossfire or SLI box using a Mac, but it might be possible if you feel like being experimental (Apple uses Intel-standard chipsets, so crossfire might be a possiblity).Another thing to weigh is that while a PC is cheaper initially, a Mac retains its value better over time. If you decide to sell your Mac 18 months from now when you are ready to upgrade, you will discover that you could actually get nearly 2/3 of what you paid, while a similar PC will only be worth roughly half of the initial investment. And this gap widens significantly over time. There are Macs over 10 years old that still sell for $300, and you couldn't even give away a PC from that same era.Of course, I apologize if I come across as an Apple Fanboi, but I am actually quite far from that. I appreciate any good product, no matter who makes it, and had to chime in when I saw the unwashed masses weighing in with their uninformed opinions. Of course, the old adage holds true, that opinions are like rear ends...everyone has one, and everyone thinks everyone else's stinks.[/citation]
Pretty good post. I am not an Apple fan, but I must admit you made a lot of good points. Unlike a lot of other Mac users (including Tuan Nguyen, the guy that wrote this article) you do not repeat the same brainwashed mantra of "it just works".
I have to disagree with some of your points though. Sure the price of computers built by all OEMs does go up, but I find that with Dell, HP, and Lenovo the price goes up only a fraction of what the upgrade costs for Macs are.
I don't buy your argument about the worth of a Mac lasting longer than another OEM built computer. I would love to see this 10 year old $300 machine. Anyways, Apple is talking about completely moving away from the x86 architecture, which would effectively make the current x86 Macs be worthless in the near future (No more support, no new OS).
Lastly, I think you are forgetting something with today's graphics cards. Size. I doubt any of them would fit inside of the Mac case. Not to mention the heating issues. Even if you did get the card to work in boot and fit inside the case, you would have to use a different card once you are back in the Mac OS. Sorry, but good discrete graphics cards in the Mac is just a no go right now.