Oh Now I see that. Thanks..
But I think they could have made it more readily available for the consumers. I think many people make same mistake as me.
Also why a ram that is caplable of 3200-16 cannot run at 3200-19 1.2V? Can't they just modify the table somehow?
They probably assume -- rightly -- that a consumer who actually has the need of the timings of a stick of RAM probably also has the ability to look up the RAM. What's important is that the information is easily available to someone who needs this information, and it is. The only exception is with PSUs, which have the tables printed on them because this is safety equipment. Not knowing whether a stick is CAS 15 or CAS 19 won't fry your fancy new GPU, but a mystery PSU might.
I'm not sure why you want higher latency on your RAM. Yeah, RAM can be run at slower rates than it's rated for, but I'm not sure why they need to specifically note that. My office chair has a maximum capacity of 250 pounds; I don't need an additional table to let me know that it can also support 225 or 200 pounds!
As for binning, this is a normal practice in semiconductors. RAM of different speeds isn't just cranked out of different machines with the proper clock speed. Semiconductor fabrication does not actually result in perfect, identical copies. So RAM is tested together and given a rating based on those tests. The same thing goes on with your CPU and GPU; a midrange CPU and GPU are more often than not, simply higher-end chips that didn't meet the standards to be called the higher-end CPU or GPU.