It's been a while since I've noticed some of my internal HDDs are not performing as well as I think they should. I've decided to copy the same set of files to the same HDD on clean boot: once directly on my mobo SATA and once on my USB docking station. On the docking station the whole transfer went smoothly, averaging around 90mb/s, never on 100% active time and with average response time around 400ms when highest. Directly on SATA the average speed was aroung 50mb/s (started for a few seconds on 250mb/s, which didn't happen on USB dock, but quickly went to 90mb/s, then oscillating between 39mb/s and 60mb/s), average response time higher than 2000ms sometimes and 100% active time. I can confirm that this is not the only HDD that I've noticed behaving strangely. Most of my HDDs are 2TB Barracuda, that I get for cheap storage for RAW files. The only one that I think acted as expected was a 1tb Barracuda. I'm betting it has to do with Windows and its drivers, since I've updated the BIOS to rule this out. I've actually tried to update HDD firmware also. I guess the only thing I didn't try yet is reinstalling the OS or trying a different one.
Does anyone have a guess on why such a performance difference?
My specs:
Windows 10 Pro 19043
AMD Ryzen 7 3700x
TUF-Gaming X570-Plus
2x8gb 3466mhz Trident Z G.Skill
Corsair HX850i
OS in on a KINGSTON SV300S37A240G
The HDD tested was a 2tb Barracuda ST2000DM008-2FR102. I have other 2 of those and a ST2000DM001-1ER164. All behave weirdly on SATA. The only one that acted according to expectations was the ST1000DM003, and the only major difference is that it was a dynamic disk, but that shouldn't make a difference, right?
Does anyone have a guess on why such a performance difference?
My specs:
Windows 10 Pro 19043
AMD Ryzen 7 3700x
TUF-Gaming X570-Plus
2x8gb 3466mhz Trident Z G.Skill
Corsair HX850i
OS in on a KINGSTON SV300S37A240G
The HDD tested was a 2tb Barracuda ST2000DM008-2FR102. I have other 2 of those and a ST2000DM001-1ER164. All behave weirdly on SATA. The only one that acted according to expectations was the ST1000DM003, and the only major difference is that it was a dynamic disk, but that shouldn't make a difference, right?