[
I think this defeats the whole purpose of a forum, which is supposed to be a place for open communication and discussion. By limiting posts, you stifle the point and chase people away from these forums.
Personally, I post quite often, and only a small amount of those are "useless one liners" (its good to blow off steam oncce in a while. Often when I am trying to help someone, it takes at least 5 or 6 posts in one thread. I think limiting posts would ultimately cripple this forum.
You all raise valid points.
So enhance the system to: (on top of the above stuff mentioned that people think
would work).
- 448 posts maximum over the last 2 weeks only, which is an 'average' of 32 posts per day, but shouldn't stop people from communicating.
- A given user can only start a maximum of 3 threads per day, until midnight rollover (on server, or by user locale ?)
- Perhaps limit replies to 32 per thread, per user, per day (so everyone could post multiple times in multiple threads).
- The person who starts a thread has much higher limits, perhaps up to 128 posts per day, per thread they start, (maximum of 3 threads per day), by the person that started the thread. Just as now a double post will not increase your post count by 2, it only does it by 1. (I did this above to demonstrate it).
Would the above really be 'limiting' peoples ability to communicate effectively at all ?
I find this thread very useful as 'a discussion', since can see all sides of the arguement, and the voting / poll results are currently in line with what I originally expected. (More against, less for, and over 10% donkey).
A machince could be coded to, and actually follow the 'learning process' I just went though (OK). It still wouldn't 'learn' per say like a human can, it would just do what it was coded to do. (Lets just say I have a passing interest in REAL-WORLD AI, not that fake / hollywood movie AI). The term should really be Synthetic Intelligence.