Wii U CPU and GPU Rendered in High-Res

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.
[citation][nom]Tomfreak[/nom]I still have no idea why they clock the CPU at such low frequency. This isnt a mobile device, power consumption isnt an issue here. higher power VRM and power components of the motherboard to supply the higher clock CPU + better CPU cooling isnt gonna cost another $50.[/citation]
[citation][nom]tipoo[/nom]Because it's Nintendo, that's why. Slightly higher clocks may not have cost much more, but they want to hit certain price points and they were already taking a small loss on Wii U hardware, and taking a loss on hardware isn't Nintendos style. They got to a level where it can get most ports from the 360/ps3 gen, and that's good enough for them, forget about next gen. Same strategy as the Wii. I do agree though, I'd rather it draw 70 watts or even more for higher clocked parts and better cooling, the difference is like half a lightbulb, switch one off or to a CFL if it's the planet you're worried about.[/citation]

[citation][nom]wanderer11[/nom]Why would anyone care about power consumption on a stationary box? I would rather have a 200W chip if it was going to be more powerful.[/citation]

the japanese market.
they prefer low power
they also prefer smaller form factor due to the living space many have.
 
I find it as odd as anyone else here that Tom's made an article out of my image. I was the one who made it, and the reason for it is that it's hard to get good pictures that are free to use. One can't grab iFixit's, AnandTech's or even Nintendo's teardown pictures and use them freely, there's copyright attached to such images. So, I made one for Wikipedia and released it as public domain.

It's made entirely in Photoshop CS6 and was not quite as easy as just drawing a couple of rectangles :) There is actually quite a lot of details here that's not apparent when looking at the available teardown pictures, and those pictures are most certainly not as high resolution as the one I uploaded to Wikipedia. This is a composite image of three of them, and drawn to look a bit realistic, but not overly so. I got in trouble with folks at Wikipedia over another picture of a processor that they thought was just a screen grab of someone else's photo, which would've been verboten :/ The QR code is my signature and goes to my home page, which currently is offline :) I couldn't make out the correct 2D barcode so I just stuck my code in there. Artistic freedom.

Here's more of my work: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Henriok My other pictures are used frequently by AnandTech, Ars Technica and other news sources around the world so I guess they too like the freedom that a public domain picture comes with.
 
[citation][nom]manoohman[/nom]they should of used a amd APU[/citation]
Considering the bandwidth on board, neither solution would've performed any better than the other. So, this would've made sense, especially considering the low CPU clocks on offer... unless AMD couldn't produce enough, that is.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

TRENDING THREADS