will it have problem?

1crank

Reputable
Aug 14, 2014
4
0
4,510
i want to buy i3 4330, r9 270 and 8 gb ram 1600mhz, so i have read that it may bottlneck or have problems, but others say that they have i3 and r9 280x and they dont have any problems. so what i must do
 
Solution
The i3-4330 is quite a strong CPU. Scores higher framerates than the FX-8320 in most games, and the FX-8350 in some. If it bottlenecks an R9 270, then literally everyone who has any AMD CPU is in serious trouble.
The i3-4330 is quite a strong CPU. Scores higher framerates than the FX-8320 in most games, and the FX-8350 in some. If it bottlenecks an R9 270, then literally everyone who has any AMD CPU is in serious trouble.
 
Solution
You won't have a problem with that gpu being bottlenecked, as that cpu is fast, though only 2 cores (4 threads). But, personally I'd look at something like i5-4460/4570/4670/4690 if you can, probably extra $50 US, but worth it, as you'd be getting a 4 core cpu.
 


There's no doubting an i5-4460 or above would be a bit quicker (oddly enough, the i5-4430 is roughly on-par with the i3-4330 in overall performance). But at a price/performance ratio it's hard/impossible to get better than an i3-4130, i3-4150, or i3-4330 right now.
 

just go n buy core i5 or fx-8350 with r9 270x 2gb boost oc

 


The FX-8350 is very overpriced relative to its gaming performance; it's firmly a video editing professional/business CPU that's matched by an i3-4130 in many games, and beat by any haswell i5 in practically every game. The architecture is not intended for the type of performance that gaming requires, but is instead geared towards many light threads.

The R9 270X is mostly an overclocked R9 270. Not worth the extra on a tight budget.
 

if you have money problem than get fx-6300, you can save your money and gaming performance between i3 and fx 6300 will be neglactable
 


The i3-4130 beats the FX-6300 in nearly every game. The i3-4330 just offers a bit more performance, not perfect on a budget but still a better price/performance ratio for gaming than an FX CPU.
 

are you a intel fan boy?,
in real world I had used both of the processor, And noticed the difference between them
 


If by "Intel fanboy" you mean "person who knows facts", then I suppose.

Sure you have. Tell me all about how you own the FX-6300, FX-8350, FX-8320, i3-4130, i3-4330, i5-4670, corresponding motherboards, and how you've tested them all in the majority of games in existence. Also, now that we're making absurd claims, I'm a unicorn.

Here are some tests. Much more reliable than whatever random guessing you claim to have experienced. For reference, the i3-4330 is noticeably stronger than the i3-4130, and nearly identical to the i3-4340.

http://www.xbitlabs.com/images/cpu/core-i3-4340-4330-4130/Charts-1/sleepingdogs.png
http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/2013/11/14/intel-core-i3-4130-haswell-review/5
http://2-ps.googleusercontent.com/h/www.hardcoreware.net/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/570x421xassassins-creed-iv-fps3.png.pagespeed.ic.fndiB29yZP.png
http://3-ps.googleusercontent.com/h/www.hardcoreware.net/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/570x421xbattlefield-4-fps2.png.pagespeed.ic.1d8vhdafmu.png
http://1-ps.googleusercontent.com/h/www.hardcoreware.net/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/570x421xcrysis-3-fps2.png.pagespeed.ic.OxVs5ewy2I.png
http://3-ps.googleusercontent.com/h/www.hardcoreware.net/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/570x421xmetro-last-light-fps2.png.pagespeed.ic.bM4-528tqp.png
http://2-ps.googleusercontent.com/h/www.hardcoreware.net/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/570x421xtomb-raider-fps2.png.pagespeed.ic.u5WegqRFBr.png
http://www.techspot.com/articles-info/827/bench/CPU_01.png

The FX CPUs are made mostly for rendering, not gaming.
 

Intel have built in gpu and amd dont have any built in gpu, but when you use graphics card gpu with intel cpus you will notice the difference between amd and intel

 


If you think that makes a difference, you really don't know how CPUs work.