yipsl :
You're right. My mistake. I was using the drop down menu and looking at different OEM systems with Toliman X3's at Newegg. This Acer has an x3 8650 with the 780G, but it's $549.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16883103151
I had 8750 in my head but provided the wrong link. I had meant to provide the 8650. It's close enough to the 8750 that his experience would have been the same.
Still, if he was going to buy OEM and spend the same amount as that dual core Celeron, the 8400 is a better deal, especially considering the onboard graphics.
I'm glad he'll try building his own. It's easier than most people think. Anyone who can insert a graphics card and set it up should be able to build their own.
The E7300 is incrementally better in games right now at stock, but the X3 8750 is good too. Anandtech was spot on in their sub $1,000 PC article.
If I were the OP, I'd wait a bit and see how Phenom II prices affect Agena's, and how Intel responds.
I am so tempted to switch the 8750 out for a Phenom II 920 when income tax time comes, as Gigabyte has a bios for my board that supports Phenom II. I'll wait to see independent benchies first though, it might not be 20% improvement as reported.
The E7300's a good CPU, but he'll need to factor in a monitor in addition to the 4650. My point was with an ATI HD3200, he could wait on the discrete GPU until he can afford it and put the difference into a $105 19" LCD.
The worst thing about AMD buying ATI in my opinion was the end of ATI chipsets and integrated graphics for Intel motherboards.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16883103151
I had 8750 in my head but provided the wrong link. I had meant to provide the 8650. It's close enough to the 8750 that his experience would have been the same.
Still, if he was going to buy OEM and spend the same amount as that dual core Celeron, the 8400 is a better deal, especially considering the onboard graphics.
I'm glad he'll try building his own. It's easier than most people think. Anyone who can insert a graphics card and set it up should be able to build their own.
The E7300 is incrementally better in games right now at stock, but the X3 8750 is good too. Anandtech was spot on in their sub $1,000 PC article.
If I were the OP, I'd wait a bit and see how Phenom II prices affect Agena's, and how Intel responds.
I am so tempted to switch the 8750 out for a Phenom II 920 when income tax time comes, as Gigabyte has a bios for my board that supports Phenom II. I'll wait to see independent benchies first though, it might not be 20% improvement as reported.
The E7300's a good CPU, but he'll need to factor in a monitor in addition to the 4650. My point was with an ATI HD3200, he could wait on the discrete GPU until he can afford it and put the difference into a $105 19" LCD.
The worst thing about AMD buying ATI in my opinion was the end of ATI chipsets and integrated graphics for Intel motherboards.
The acer with integrated graphics and no monitor is $550 compared with the dell that is only $450, add a hd 4650 to that you are at the same price as the acer with much better performance. Besides he is replacing a broken pc that had a monitor so that shouldn't be an issue as he can reuse the old one.