>While such articles might help them meet short-term traffic goals, in the long run those kinds of tactics will negatively impact the site's credibility.
I think THW's bread & butter is its HW reviews, many of which are on Google's first page of search hits when people go to look for reviews of things they want to buy. I doubt these filler content matters much in regards to making money.
But blogs need fresh new content everyday, just to keep the regular users to frequent, and there aren't enough reviews or "hard news" for that. The filler pieces need not be good or even relevant, but only as something for us to "doomscroll" through. I see this to varying degrees on all ad-supported sites--rumors, odd news, deals, and whatever the site staff can think of to fill the site.
And every site rehashes news/info from other sites. I don't think it's realistic or reasonable to expect "original reporting" when we're not paying for content (other than our eyeballs).
>...especially as AI makes it easier for countless other sites to crop up doing the exact same thing.
The addition of AI-generated content into the mix will come, I'm sure, as soon as it can get to a passable degree of "reporting." I think that will be fairly soon, not because of AI advances as much, but by the low bar of quality these filler content requires. I don't think sites will change that much, but freelancing jobs for filler pieces, like this one, will disappear.
>Either way, I felt it was reasonable to correct the misinformation to perhaps spare someone from being misdirected by it.
The piece has already scrolled off the front page (into digital oblivion). And I think we've read enough of these "doom is nigh" pieces that scant attention is paid. It's mainly fodder for the usual "Windows sux" venting, all of which are on display here. We all like to vent.