Windows 7 Starter Three App Limit Gone for Good

Status
Not open for further replies.

apmyhr

Distinguished
Apr 23, 2009
258
0
18,780
0
Lack of Multi monitor support is the killer in that list. I always use two monitors on my desktops. And any laptop I get in the future I will want to be able to use it to play movies on my TV's.

I'm suprised they don't let you change the background image. I could see more people bitching about that then the 3 app limit.
 

Tindytim

Distinguished
Sep 16, 2008
1,179
0
19,280
0
[citation][nom]apmyhr[/nom]Lack of Multi monitor support is the killer in that list. I always use two monitors on my desktops. And any laptop I get in the future I will want to be able to use it to play movies on my TV's.[/citation]
Why would you be using a netbook for all of that!?

The Home versions will do what you want, and they'll come with most regular usage computers.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Changing the background will be possible from within Dos, find background file, rename and replace with new file giving it same name!
 

thesmokingman14

Distinguished
Nov 17, 2007
27
0
18,530
0
The personalization features are pretty cool and, after using Aero Glass, I don't think I want to go back. However, as apmyhr noted above, the lack of multi monitor support is not acceptable.
 

mirkos

Distinguished
Jun 2, 2009
17
0
18,510
0
I can understand the fact that win7 starter will not support some features, but I wouldn't accept to have such a restriction for something I paid for! It's more like punishment because I bought starter edition! It's a good think they withdraw it.
 

apmyhr

Distinguished
Apr 23, 2009
258
0
18,780
0
[citation][nom]jtt283[/nom]Being unable to watch a DVD will make systems with this OS useless for traveling users.Will it be able to stream media from web sites?[/citation]
Maybe I don't understand the restriction correctly, but I assume its just refering to Windows Media Player. I'm sure you can download VLC or whatever and play DVD's fine.
 

Onus

Titan
Moderator
Good point about VLC, but that may not work for Joe Salesman. It will be interesting to see how Microsquishy's marketing addresses this; recommend a third-party product in order to sell crippled netbooks, or try to recommend pricier machines that on a large scale may break corporate budgets.
 

Spanky Deluxe

Distinguished
Mar 24, 2009
507
0
18,980
0
On the whole, far more reasonable. At first I thought the lack of DVD playback would be bad but then, this is aimed at Netbooks that don't even have a DVD drive and any machine that does come with a drive won't come with Starter Edition. The only thing that strikes me as plain mean and silly is not being able to change your background image. I mean, come on!
 

grieve

Distinguished
Apr 19, 2004
2,709
0
20,790
4
Not being able to change your background image is a little odd... As much as people will HATE this it would not be enough to force them into purchasing a more expensive OS.

"OH LOOK! $40 more i can get Win7 Home that allows me to change my desktop image"
I cannot see a lot of people doing this.
 

scryer_360

Distinguished
Jan 13, 2007
564
0
18,980
0
In answer to the question of the article:

Yes. No DVD playback? No personalization (not even on par with Windows 95)? No ability to "peak" at unopen windows? All of those are things I've learned to live with, and want. Having an OS so very crippled makes me think that Home Basic would be better for people like my parents, who just surf the web and email, and occasionally do some media-centric tasks, and Home Premium would be better for me.

Of course, I'm getting Ultimate anyway.
 

michaelzehr

Distinguished
Sep 18, 2008
60
0
18,640
1
The background desktop image on Windows 7 starter will be an ad for upgrading from the starter version... that's why MS won't let you change it. :)
 
I'm not writing about starter edition. I'm writing about XPM. M$ makes it sound like they are giving a free version of XP with the upper SKU's. I wonder if this free version of XP can be installed as a stand alone and be truly free.;) I'm guessing not.

M$ is attempting a new practice of using compatibility to sale their different versions. XP and before all SKU's had about the same backwards compatibility. Without XPM Home versions will have to wait for 3rd party emulation software which may take upto 3 years.

Whats next? Driver limits making it impossible to use anything beyond integrated graphics on anything but ultimate edition.

M$ want a higher price for their OS and without old XP software many more users may migrate to linux. I may revisit the ideal of buying win7 home in 2~3 years when 3rd party emulation may allow my old software.
 

marraco

Distinguished
Jan 6, 2007
671
0
18,990
1
[citation][nom]grieve[/nom]Not being able to change your background image is a little odd... As much as people will HATE this it would not be enough to force them into purchasing a more expensive OS."OH LOOK! $40 more i can get Win7 Home that allows me to change my desktop image" I cannot see a lot of people doing this.[/citation]

There are laptops without DVD. It does not matter, because you can use a Pen drive to upload an ISO of a dvd and use it from a DVD drive emulator.

It would not works on Windows 7 without DVD support.
 
Whelp, they have to give people just enough so that they don't switch over to a Linux Netbook. Even though I'm not big on netbooks ^_^, if I had one I would prefer to run Linux on it than Windows myself.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Ok,my 2ct on netbooks and the limitations set by MS:

* Aero Glass, meaning you can only use the “Windows Basic” or other opaque themes. It also means you do not get Taskbar Previews or Aero Peek.
-> Makes sense. Netbooks are not graphical monsters.

* Personalization features for changing desktop backgrounds, window colors, or sound schemes.
->Does NOT make sense! What if I want the plain win98/NT/2000/ME looks? What if I don't like windows sounds at all, and want to disable it?
What if I want a black background and don't want a custom picture?
This sucks!

* The ability to switch between users without having to log off.
-> Makes sense, netbooks are no desktops or servers with many people logging on or off. Saves resources to only be able to log 1 person on at the time.
* Multi-monitor support.
-> I hope that external monitor is included! Netbooks generally could benefit from their external monitor (eg: netbook 1024x600 screen for program controls, while the external LCD screen might be good for movies or main program screen). I hope that a '1 screen at a time' rule will not result in the inability to use the external monitor/TV/screen!

* DVD playback.
-> Mini netbooks don't have DVD's generally. But it's a rule that only bugs a minority of people. I'd rather if they would disable blueray than DVD. But in most cases people won't use netbooks to watch DVD's. If they want to use them they would encode their DVD's to a DivX/XViD/Mpeg4 file,and play that back, since it uses less battery; or use their laptop/desktop to view DVD's.

* Windows Media Center for watching recorded TV or other media.
-> Only a very small set of people will be affected. The only thing I can object here is for people who bought a Box pc like the EeeBox or Windbox, to use as HD center. They would probably mind this a lot, or go XP.

* Remote Media Streaming for streaming your music, videos, and recorded TV from your home computer.
-> Is ok, a netbook is no server.

* Domain support for business customers.
-> A business generally has more money for their netbooks and probably will buy a win7 upgrade.

* XP Mode for those that want the ability to run older Windows XP
programs on Windows 7.
-> Makes sense. XP virtualized on netbooks is not very common. Especially if the netbooks are only equipped with 1 GB of RAM and an Atom processor.

Things they could improve on:
There are many services that no longer make any sense, like 'telnet', to connect to the internet via a modem.

It would probably also make more sense to equip netbooks with an installation CD that installs everything, and disable any system restore.
System restore takes a big toll on netbooks with SSD.

Limit defrag and scandisk to one disk at a time...
For me, I never use these functions anyways.

That would probably be good enough for mini netbooks.
 

tipoo

Distinguished
May 4, 2006
1,183
0
19,280
0
[citation][nom]ryokinshin[/nom]Microsoft listening? THAT'S A NEW ONE.[/citation]


Except NOT.

They listened to alot of feedback for 7, and it really shows.
 

lexspecialis

Distinguished
Feb 8, 2009
24
0
18,510
0
not long ago everyone was bitchin' about the 3 app limitation. now it's the background, the dvd, and whatnot.. People, this is THE STARTER EDITION. It's not meant to be a full fledged OS. If you want all of that functionality, buy the Home Premium, or the other packages.

Anyway, kudos to MS for listening.
 

hellwig

Distinguished
May 29, 2008
1,743
0
19,860
26
I have to think people are correct in that no-DVD support means no Windows Media Player DVD playback. Programs like Cyberlink PowerDVD use their own DVD decoders, and I think they would still work assuming your computer had a DVD drive. Seriously, has anyone ever bought a retail-packaged DVD drive that didn't come with DVD-player software?
 
G

Guest

Guest
Hopefully Starter will be available separatly for OEM desktops too then.

I mean, paying less for the priviliege of not having to manually strip out a lot of absolutely useless - and resource-hnungry - features?

What's not to like.

Of course, if there end up being a hardware "ceiling" for what Starter runs on - as has been implied in previous articles - I guess I'm screwed anyway.

TBH, I'd pay more for less - as long as "less" means a leaner windows installation.

The only thing I'd lack from the feautures mentioned would be the customization options - though if I still get the option of "no sounds" and a solid black background that's more than enough for me.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ASK THE COMMUNITY

TRENDING THREADS