If no one ever used a pc before and sat down in front of a Windows 8 pc and a Windows 7 pc, I'm about 90% sure people would pick up on Win8 faster.
The problem is twofold.
First, Windows 95-7 all looked close enough where once you learned one, you could use the next with just a minor learning curve between. So for everyone that is used to Windows already, Windows 8 is a system shock. Way too much changed way too fast and we're not used to big jumps in the OS.
Second, Windows 8 was designed as a touchscreen interface. I've used Windows 7 and 8 with touchscreens and 8 just feels right with one. Problem is it just feels wrong without one as well. Most pcs being sold with 8 don't have touchscreens so it feels as messy and alien as running Android on a desktop.
MS made Windows 8 as a unifying OS. It looks, feels and acts the same on a phone, tablet and PC. For people that want the same on all their devices, this is great. For people that want a desktop to run like a desktop with keyboard (the standard, what is FAMILIAR) and mouse and their phones and tablets to run on touch it just feels WRONG the second you use it.
I'm tired of hearing how the users are stupid because they can't adjust. That would be like if you used a steering wheel with brake and gas pedals all your life to drive a car and went to a dealership to take a test drive and all the new models had was a flight type joystick and throttle, then the salesman called YOU an idiot because you "couldn't adjust" by the time you sat down in front of it.
Some people are going to pick up on it right away, but most are going to want to hold on to their clunker as long as possible to avoid such a major change. MS made a huge mistake, all they had to do is make an option, "metro" or "classic" on setup and no one would be bitching but instead we get metro jammed down our throats with no other option (besides 3rd party) and get told we're idiots?
Really?
For god's sake that's the most asinine statement on the planet.
The problem is twofold.
First, Windows 95-7 all looked close enough where once you learned one, you could use the next with just a minor learning curve between. So for everyone that is used to Windows already, Windows 8 is a system shock. Way too much changed way too fast and we're not used to big jumps in the OS.
Second, Windows 8 was designed as a touchscreen interface. I've used Windows 7 and 8 with touchscreens and 8 just feels right with one. Problem is it just feels wrong without one as well. Most pcs being sold with 8 don't have touchscreens so it feels as messy and alien as running Android on a desktop.
MS made Windows 8 as a unifying OS. It looks, feels and acts the same on a phone, tablet and PC. For people that want the same on all their devices, this is great. For people that want a desktop to run like a desktop with keyboard (the standard, what is FAMILIAR) and mouse and their phones and tablets to run on touch it just feels WRONG the second you use it.
I'm tired of hearing how the users are stupid because they can't adjust. That would be like if you used a steering wheel with brake and gas pedals all your life to drive a car and went to a dealership to take a test drive and all the new models had was a flight type joystick and throttle, then the salesman called YOU an idiot because you "couldn't adjust" by the time you sat down in front of it.
Some people are going to pick up on it right away, but most are going to want to hold on to their clunker as long as possible to avoid such a major change. MS made a huge mistake, all they had to do is make an option, "metro" or "classic" on setup and no one would be bitching but instead we get metro jammed down our throats with no other option (besides 3rd party) and get told we're idiots?
Really?
For god's sake that's the most asinine statement on the planet.