Labor costs are No. 2 problem for the electronics supply chain.
Workforce Shortages Could Lead to Further Price Hikes : Read more
Workforce Shortages Could Lead to Further Price Hikes : Read more
The scheduled forum maintenance has now been completed. If you spot any issues, please report them here in this thread. Thank you!
It's not crazy, it's stupid. Despite the disproportionately large compensation packages executives receive vs the average worker, their pay is an insignificant portion of the overall payroll of the company. Look at a company like TSMC. It has nearly 60,000 employees. Let's pretend the CEO makes $50 million a year in cash, which is way more than he makes. If the company decided to pay him nothing and spread that $50 million among the other employees, that comes out to less than $850 a year per employee. The median salary at TSMC is estimated to be about $125,000 (not exactly slave wages). What difference is boosting that to $125,850 going to make? You're not ending labor shortages with that, or boosting team morale. Median salary could be $40,000, and that extra $850 would still have no measurable impact on anything.Maybe companies should spend more money compensating their employees and employ more people instead of concentrating all their wealth in the executive level?
I know, crazy talk. 🙃
It's not crazy, it's stupid. Despite the disproportionately large compensation packages executives receive vs the average worker, their pay is an insignificant portion of the overall payroll of the company. Look at a company like TSMC. It has nearly 60,000 employees. Let's pretend the CEO makes $50 million a year in cash, which is way more than he makes. If the company decided to pay him nothing and spread that $50 million among the other employees, that comes out to less than $850 a year per employee. The median salary at TSMC is estimated to be about $125,000 (not exactly slave wages). What difference is boosting that to $125,850 going to make? You're not ending labor shortages with that, or boosting team morale. Median salary could be $40,000, and that extra $850 would still have no measurable impact on anything.
It's not crazy, it's stupid. Despite the disproportionately large compensation packages executives receive vs the average worker, their pay is an insignificant portion of the overall payroll of the company. Look at a company like TSMC. It has nearly 60,000 employees. Let's pretend the CEO makes $50 million a year in cash, which is way more than he makes. If the company decided to pay him nothing and spread that $50 million among the other employees, that comes out to less than $850 a year per employee. The median salary at TSMC is estimated to be about $125,000 (not exactly slave wages). What difference is boosting that to $125,850 going to make? You're not ending labor shortages with that, or boosting team morale. Median salary could be $40,000, and that extra $850 would still have no measurable impact on anything.