The first wood transistor doesn’t switch very fast, but it gets extra points for sustainability and biodegradability.
World's First Wood Transistor Chops Out at 1 Hz : Read more
World's First Wood Transistor Chops Out at 1 Hz : Read more
That isn't remotely true and suggests you're seriously lacking imagination and creativity. It will likely have long-term applications in farming and forestry, for embedding some monitoring & control circuits directly into the plants, themselves.What "future work and applications"?! This is totally useless. Clearly some people have entirely too much free time and resources at their disposal.
What "future work and applications"?! This is totally useless. Clearly some people have entirely too much free time and resources at their disposal.
If nature figured out how to grow bones and shells, then I trust there's a way to coerce plants to do something equivalent to what they did, here.It may have started out has wood just not sure it can be called wood once the lignin was removed leaving only long cellulose fibres. The "wood" was just there to give shape to the "a conductive plastic, or polymer, calledPEDOT:pSS
,",
Also not sure how environmental it all is either.
Exactly where did anyone suggest they would ever replace silicon-based electronics?Silicon is more sustainable than wood
Even before profitability, simply finding applications for it that are potentially profitable is enough to draw research grants to get it there.Umm, there would need to be money involved to the point it was PROFITABLE. Make it profitable, and the tech will advance.
I think we've already answered that question well enough.Why wood, btw?
I find it interesting that you have such expansive knowledge of our galaxy. Remind me to ask you about that, another time.Isn't there more interesting mixtures of compounds to try? I mean, wood is like the most rare resource in the galaxy. It just happens to be plentiful HERE.
Every time there is an announcement about, unusual research projects, there is always somebody who just derides it as useless.What "future work and applications"?! This is totally useless. Clearly some people have entirely too much free time and resources at their disposal.
Add some AI to the recipe, and nature could become the next Cyderdyne! The way nature is suffering from human exploitation and destruction today, it would be arguably better to have Skynet Treants kicking our butts till we fix it, than Cylons kicking our butts into outer spaceIf nature figured out how to grow bones and shells, then I trust there's a way to coerce plants to do something equivalent to what they did, here.
Experiment a sun ? Nah, fast-spoking ain't working for meTo all the naysayers, heres a few words for you.
(say it fast)
Ex Per I Men Ta Shun
I rather doubt that replacing the lignin in wood with sulfonated polystyrene is more "sustainable" than silicon, which after all is merely refined sand. Certainly those who deride this research as useless are wrong (pure research is almost never useless), but claiming this is a great leap forward environmentally is even further off base.Think of all the electronics out there that don't need fast processing...Things like wood-based electronics would make them more sustainable...
While you have a point about the perils of overly extrapolating our knowledge, I think it's a monumentally safe bet that elemental silicon is far more prevalent in the universe at large than all forms of life combined, much less the substance known as "wood".I find it interesting that you have such expansive knowledge of our galaxy. Remind me to ask you about that, another time.
Have we tried etching pathways then coating with graphite/graphene?The first wood transistor doesn’t switch very fast, but it gets extra points for sustainability and biodegradability.
World's First Wood Transistor Chops Out at 1 Hz : Read more
To get enough compute density and efficiency into plants, I think the transistor isn't a viable technology. You'd probably need to approach it from the perspective of trying to create a plant version of a neuron.Add some AI to the recipe, and nature could become the next Cyderdyne!
The thing people tend not to appreciate about plants is that they're able to sense much about their environment and surroundings. We know this, because they react to a wide range of changes in a variety of different ways. Embedding circuitry into them could help us tap into their sensor network, so we can use them to monitor their surroundings. This could be used for environmental monitoring.The way nature is suffering from human exploitation and destruction today,
While you're concerned only with the main elemental ingredient of semiconductors, there are other considerations. Assembly being chief among them. Life has gotten very good at assembling things, even on a molecular level, and can build nanostructures that put our latest & greatest lithography to shame.While you have a point about the perils of overly extrapolating our knowledge, I think it's a monumentally safe bet that elemental silicon is far more prevalent in the universe at large than all forms of life combined, much less the substance known as "wood".
Really? Exploring other materials is the smartest thing researchers can do. Inspiration can come from any line of inquiry.What "future work and applications"?! This is totally useless. Clearly some people have entirely too much free time and resources at their disposal.
Quite true. However, despite the click-bait headline, these circuits are actually composed of sulfonated polystyrenes, not wood. And research into self-assembly of silicon-based semiconductors is rampant. I'd even hazard a bet that we'll see actual production of self-assembled silicon within the next decade. On a semi-related note, I'm sure you're aware of the speculation that silicon-based life may be widespread in the universe. Silicon compounds have nearly as much prevalence to self-assembly as do carbon ones.While you're concerned only with the main elemental ingredient of semiconductors, there are other considerations. Assembly being chief among them. Life has gotten very good at assembling things, even on a molecular level
I haven't followed this plot, but I remember seeing some doubt cast on its inherent efficiency and suitability vs. carbon. Wikipedia enumerates some fundamental disadvantages of silicon, as a carbon alternative:On a semi-related note, I'm sure you're aware of the speculation that silicon-based life may be widespread in the universe. Silicon compounds have nearly as much prevalence to self-assembly as do carbon ones.