brandonjclark
Distinguished
Wanna see my spaceship?I find it interesting that you have such expansive knowledge of our galaxy. Remind me to ask you about that, another time.
Wanna see my spaceship?I find it interesting that you have such expansive knowledge of our galaxy. Remind me to ask you about that, another time.
Smaller junctions are more subject to bit flips from cosmic rays. We wouldn't need ECC RAM if not for that. Then there are also bit flips in the silicon itself, e.g., in the processor registers. Basically you need a larger junction to be less vulnerable. When the space shuttle was flying it had several i386 processors, but at the time, other CPU technology was far faster; however, it was the older tech which was more immune to radiation hazards. Mostly I'd agree this is probably just something interesting, but how do wood junctions (with their large sizes) survive in comparison in a location of high radiation? I could easily see some possibility that if there is any advantage for wood, e.g., in space, that this wouldn't be just a exercise in novelty.What "future work and applications"?! This is totally useless. Clearly some people have entirely too much free time and resources at their disposal.
That feels like an offer I should probably decline.Wanna see my spaceship?
Like fungiThe real breakthrough is going to be when someone figures out how to grow these, and use them to genetically engineer circuits directly into plants.
Of course, I was only joking, just in a sci-fi way. Your post about nature figuring ways to adapt and evolve made me think what if...To get enough compute density and efficiency into plants, I think the transistor isn't a viable technology. You'd probably need to approach it from the perspective of trying to create a plant version of a neuron.
The thing people tend not to appreciate about plants is that they're able to sense much about their environment and surroundings. We know this, because they react to a wide range of changes in a variety of different ways. Embedding circuitry into them could help us tap into their sensor network, so we can use them to monitor their surroundings. This could be used for environmental monitoring.
That could make my sci-fi joke a reality! Seriously though, that would be a major breakthrough.The real breakthrough is going to be when someone figures out how to grow these, and use them to genetically engineer circuits directly into plants.
Fungi look quite promising, indeed.Like fungi
Scientists have discovered that living creatures have already found a way to grow and evolve such switching transistors. We call the resultant structure a "neuron". Luckily, no creature has managed to use these yet to demonstrate provable intelligence.what if we found a way to implant such a transistor to a living plant and, provided this new stimuli, the plant was able to imitate it, evolve it, and then further improve it and even grow it!
As I said, and as much as I'd like to think of it as even remotely possible, it's science fiction.
Silicon is the 8th most abundant element in the universe, slightly behind carbon, true, but orders of magnitude more prevalent than complex organic molecules like cellulose and lignin.it occurred to me to look up the composition of asteroids. According to Wikipedia, 75% of asteroids are carbonaceous or C-type.
I was referring specifically to living plants, not animals (unless a plant can be considered a creature).Scientists have discovered that living creatures have already found a way to grow and evolve such switching transistors. We call the resultant structure a "neuron". Luckily, no creature has managed to use these yet to demonstrate provable intelligence.
Not neurons, no, but certain plants do have cells which exhibit the transistor-like switching behavior you mentioned in your original post:I was referring specifically to living plants, not animals (unless a plant can be considered a creature).
Plants (and fungi, too, since they were mentioned), do not have neurons.