Your friend is only partially correct.
I've been using my 1.2GHz Duron system with 512MB of RAM and WinXP Pro to rip and burn DVD's. For a typical 90 minute movie, and I can rip <i>and</i> burn a DVD in about 45 minutes on average, and that's with a 4X burner, not the NEC burner you are talking about, which burns -/+R media at 8x (or 11,040 Kbyte/s). That includes removing extraneous menus, audio tracks, and subtitles, so the compression ratio of the main movie is as low as possible.
Of course, some of this depends on the software that you use to copy the DVD. The above statistics come from using a combination of an AnyDVD driver and Elby's CloneDVD. If I want a really high quality copy, with the least amount of compression, then the process takes a little longer. For example, if I rip with DVD Decrypter, compress and encode with DVDShrink, and burn with Nero, I could be looking at slightly over an hour for the same disk. If I allow DVDShrink to do a deep analysis of each frame before encoding, the whole process, from rip to burn, <i>could</i> be as much as 40 minutes longer.
Some of this is due to the processor speed, but much of it depends entirely on how you intend to use the software, and what that software might be.
However, although your processor is 200MHz slower than mine, I still can't see any reason, regardless of the software used, for simply ripping a DVD to take two hours. Your system is just not <i>that</i> slow.
Toey
<A HREF="http://forums.btvillarin.com/index.php?act=ST&f=41&t=328&s=91c282f2e5207e99b7a652ee13b3512a" target="_new"><font color=green>My System Rigs</font color=green></A>
___________________________________________
<A HREF="http://forums.btvillarin.com/" target="_new"><b><font color=purple>BTVILLARIN.com</font color=purple></b></A> - <i><font color=orange>Your Computer Questions Answered</font color=orange></i>