ZippyPinhead :
How can ASROCK make the mistake here when Toms Hardware chose the boards?
Because ASRock chose the board.
ZippyPinhead :
Why was ASROCK's z87 OC formula chosen instead of their formula/AC board which is also under $300?
Because ASRock chose the board.
ZippyPinhead :
Since you docked ASROCK major points for not including a mini wifi/bt card?
Because ASRock chose the board. And those points were docked, they were added to the product that provided more features for the same money
ZippyPinhead :
Also, how about including some benchmarks of actual AUDIO QUALITY on these motherboards built in sound solutions as well? Ever hear of RIghtmark Audio analyzer? Get with the times TH! And drop some of the obvious bias.........
The only obvious bias comes from the person making the
proven false accusations. In actual reality, all three of the other manufacturers agree that Tom's Hardware has
a love affair with ASRock, so everything you're saying is exactly opposite of their alternatively-biased perception. If you don't believe that, try on a pair of MSI's shoes.
Oh, and the Rightmark thing, you have to go back a ways to find reviews that include it because, after finding very little distortional difference between onboard audio solutions (and finding less than 1.5% distortion on the worst solution as I recall), it was dropped. These new claims of superiority, taking us from 101/1 S/N ratios to 106/1 S/N ratios look good on paper, but they're awfully difficult to hear. And the biggest boost in onboard audio has been higher amperage for 600Ω headphones.