Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win2000.dns (
More info?)
<danieltan@time.net.my> wrote in message
news:1112143620.872649.49120@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
> Herb, i dun understand the last paragraph you mentioned that "It is
> really more about ALLOW transfers than the type of server you set it
> on.
> For AD replication it is however irrelevant. "
Re-read the whole thing carefully and ask me an inline question.
You can allow or deny zone transfers from ANY type of server.
You MUST allow zone transfers IF you have any Seconaries.
Zone transfers are more about having Secondaries dependent
on this server than the type of server where you set it.
Do you know that a Secondary and use another Secondary for
it's Master?
(Many people think that only a Primary can be master. That's
wrong.)
Do you know that even AD-Integrated DNS servers can have
secondaries that use them for their master?
> I was asking whether AD integrated zone by default will always
> propogate itself to other DNS,
Yes, I answered this too. You need to re-read the entire
response.
But the key is the REPLICATION type -- not the server type
where you set it.
AD-Replication of DNS is NOT dependent on that setting.
BUT an AD-DNS server may need that to supply zone
transfers for some Secondary DNS.
> and you say depends on server , but last
> sentence you mentioned it is irrelevant.
AD Replication is not affected BUT some DC-DNS servers
may need the setting.
The two are NOT in conflict. You are probably making
assumptions that make it SEEM in conflict (your original
question indicated this as well.)
I was trying to both answer the question and point out the
incorrect assumptions.
> Regards
> Daniel
>
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram