Put down the thesaurus and back away from the keyboard.Insouciant, yet slightly demanding?
Obtuse with a hint of decadence?
Vaguely triangular without being intrusive?
Put down the thesaurus and back away from the keyboard.Insouciant, yet slightly demanding?
Obtuse with a hint of decadence?
Vaguely triangular without being intrusive?
As hardcore audiophile and occasional musician, I am often loured into reading articles like this to see what is up. I often have to fall back on reason using my engineering skills and checking the intersection of marketing hype with true expectations, and the hype very very rarely makes correct sense. Often the marketing boils down to marketing claims that can be held up in court.
Yes, court.The major technical claim here sounds like they are claiming that there would be reduced Ethernet packet loss.
So these guys with their cable are technically correct. I would trust that they can prove that they reduce bad data packets from getting through. Without their products on a continuous audio feed, you probably
Did you not read between the lines?move along, folks. nothing to see here at this socio-ecological train-wreck-site. worthy neither the pixels nor the neurons.
I will just leave this here: http://monsterstore.com/So, this covers Ethernet cables, but what about Wi-Fi?
I remember a joke from early 2000s, when home Wi-Fi became popular.
A company called Monster, who made overpriced cables, started to sell Wi-Fi air purifiers, so signal would be cleaner. Where are they now?
Personally, I don't care what slant the author is taking. There's an endless amount of nonsense products out there they could potentially ridicule. I don't enjoy these articles and would rather not see them cluttering up my tech news & reviews.Did you not read between the lines?
The writeup on this was laughing at this thing, not praising it.
Vote with your Left Mouse Button.Personally, I don't care what slant the author is taking. There's an endless amount of nonsense products out there they could potentially ridicule. I don't enjoy these articles and would rather not see them cluttering up my tech news & reviews.
Yes, that's the same thing I advocated, back in post #23. I only replied to your post to clarify that it changes nothing for me whether this article was written in a serious or tongue-in-cheek tone, because they're reporting on nonsense either way and I don't consider that worthwhile.Don't click on it.
Eventually they may see that clicks and interest on these go down, and don't do it so often.
Ultimately, they only post articles that will result in clicks and ad revenue.because they're reporting on nonsense either way and I don't consider that worthwhile.