Hi all,
has anyone tested whether its an performance loss to have a game and windows on the same SSD vs on 2 SSD's bound directly to the CPU? The new AMD Chipsets only support 1 PCIe 5.0 SSD over CPU since the USB 4.0 Controller takes away 4 lanes, i wonder whether its better to use 1 SSD for everything, or even buy an older X670E Mainboard which still supports 2 SSD's over CPU. The Games I'm talking about are high fps, heavily SSD/Loading dependent games (MMO with a lot of movement, loading structures and players, a lot of 'pop-in's' in general. This isnt internet latency based). I do understand that the difference should be insanely small, but what would be the best choice regarding performance there?
has anyone tested whether its an performance loss to have a game and windows on the same SSD vs on 2 SSD's bound directly to the CPU? The new AMD Chipsets only support 1 PCIe 5.0 SSD over CPU since the USB 4.0 Controller takes away 4 lanes, i wonder whether its better to use 1 SSD for everything, or even buy an older X670E Mainboard which still supports 2 SSD's over CPU. The Games I'm talking about are high fps, heavily SSD/Loading dependent games (MMO with a lot of movement, loading structures and players, a lot of 'pop-in's' in general. This isnt internet latency based). I do understand that the difference should be insanely small, but what would be the best choice regarding performance there?