ARM said:Atiwolf said:Ugh.
No, just no.
Black also radiates heat faster than red, and since the card is hotter than the
I just can't let this much misunderstanding pass by without commenting.
This is a typical mistake. I suspect people are confusing a few different topics and misunderstanding the concept of a black body and black body radiation. Black body radiation is simply the radiation of photons from all objects (not counting any radiation coming from external sources and reflected off) that are not at the theoretical temperature of 0 degrees K. The spectrum of the light (photons) emitted depends entirely upon the temperature - only very very hot things emit photons in the visible spectrum (that we can see; e.g. stars like our sun are visible because of their temperature. If you cooled them down, they would dim, but even once they became black to our eyes they would still be warm and emitting quite a bit of light, just outside of our range). Temperature and only temperature affects the spectrum - whether we are talking about plastic or metal or anything else (though naturally some materials would combust in an atmosphere like ours, at high temperatures).
Now, as for the radiation of energy from an object depending upon it's color, this is absolute rubbish. Objects that appear black to our eyes do not reflect (but rather absorb) light within the particular portion of the spectrum of light that our eyes detect - they still radiate light, as a black body (depending upon their temperature), they still transmit light (if they are very thin, light may or may not, depending upon the substance and the thickness, shine *through* an object - e.g. hold paper up between your eyes and a light), and they still reflect light ... they just don't reflect it in your visible spectrum. Likewise, objects that appear blue reflect blue photons (that is a certain frequency/wavelength range - wikipedia lists it as 450–495 nm) but absorb photons that have larger than smaller wavelengths (within the visible spectrum).
In other words, the color that you see is a mere reflection of the different frequencies reflected by objects - when it comes to radiating heat, this simply does not factor into any of the equations.
OK OK Here just for you guys!paint your XFX 8800 GTS red and we can end this debate once and for all.
Thought as much. ATi has previously released cards that had "immature drivers", but one or two drivers down the line they got some perf back.
im confused. i thought color only mattered because black absorbs a wider range of light. but if the card is in the case what light can it really abosorb. the only light getting in really should be out side of the range that we see as color and should not depend on what we see as color. unless you have a light inside of your case i cant see how the color would really matter. maybe if the case had a plastic side, but you would still need to have a lot of direct light wouldent you?
Explain this to me then: we did an experiment where we had 2 brass cups, one painted black, one unpainted. Both cups were filled with hot water at the same temperature and were monitored. The black cup cooled more quickly than the unpainted.
im confused. i thought color only mattered because black absorbs a wider range of light. but if the card is in the case what light can it really abosorb. the only light getting in really should be out side of the range that we see as color and should not depend on what we see as color. unless you have a light inside of your case i cant see how the color would really matter. maybe if the case had a plastic side, but you would still need to have a lot of direct light wouldent you?
Explain this to me then: we did an experiment where we had 2 brass cups, one painted black, one unpainted. Both cups were filled with hot water at the same temperature and were monitored. The black cup cooled more quickly than the unpainted.
Explain this to me then: we did an experiment where we had 2 brass cups, one painted black, one unpainted. Both cups were filled with hot water at the same temperature and were monitored. The black cup cooled more quickly than the unpainted.
I have a 100% clear case. So, I'll rather have a UV reactive plutonium green card to match the UV reactive water cooling fluid. :twisted:Shame it looks so ugly, but I suppose when it's hidden in your machine..... Just hate red cards, even though I've owned one or two.... what's wrong with black?
JonnyDough, please read mattc's post again before you make that a triple posting. No offense, but you making many generalizations and they are for the most part incorrect. Please see also this post on a similar issue a few months ago...
JumpingJack and Hotfoot discuss radiative heat transfer and emissivity
@ the red vs black 2900 debate:
even if they make a black version, it will still end up being red, because it will be glowing from all the heat it puts off
No particles actually have a property of "color"
The Hitchikers Guide to the Galaxy has brougt us the babelfish, also on the net.
Try typing the url into the translator found at babelfish.altavista.com I've found, in this case, that the Traditional Chinese to English does a good job
Enjoy!
you mean lost planet?The only thing worrying me is that it loose quite badly in Dx10 benches. I tought that the R600 was gonna get back it luster when Dx10 games were gonna come out. Anyway, I won't get any Dx10 card until Dx10 games start to pop out in sufficient numbers.