Question 6.35mm vs 3.5mm = no difference in sound quality?

[FullTank]

so i went through most if not all google pages about that, and pretty much came to conclusion that there is no difference in audio quality, only in durability and that 6.35mm is harder to disconnect, i'm here simply to double check that, simply because i in fact own XLR to 3.5MM YYTCG pure copper(99.99% high purity oxygen-free copper) cable which goes to my sound card, and same brand XLR to 6.35mm YYTCG pure copper cable which goes to 6.35mm to 3.5mm 8cores 7N OCC Single crystal copper plated silver adapter and then to my sound card, and i hear no difference as well, but my microphone isn't exactly costly one, if there is no difference however then i'll assume that going with just 3.5mm copper is better than with 6.35mm copper to 3.5mm silver adapter simply because it will take less for signal to pass through without any adapter, but that's only if there is no difference in audio signal from begin with

what are your thoughts guys?

 

[kanewolf]

IMO, you obsessing over insignificant differences. I don't believe you could tell the difference in a blind test.

 

[boju]

Wouldn't be over a short run of cable. Over longer distance thickness of wire gauge may make a difference, how much id imagine be ever slight if at all.

Similar concept in speaker wire.

http://www.audiogurus.com/learn/cables/speaker-wire-cable-gauge/49

 

[FullTank]

IMO, you obsessing over insignificant differences. I don't believe you could tell the difference in a blind test.

i definitely can't tell the difference between 6.35 copper through 10cm long silver adapter to 3.5, and just 3.5 copper

was here simply to double confirm that. thanks for replies!