760 SLI, Yes or no.

[unknownofprob]

always best to offer an opinion.

 

[pdasterly]

wish i had this kind of support when i was looking for my gpu's, countless hours of reading a research but no clear answers. this helped more than anything, they should add prices to make chart better for the consumer on budget. Also came to realize there is no budget triple monitor setup

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/gaming-graphics-card-review,3107-7.html

 

[mr91]

it's not an example, it's a statement.

You stated the 630 was an example and then I wrote it was bad example.

I don't get your point with your latest rebuttle.

" I didn't see all the other nonsense you wrote above when originally replaying"

 

[mr91]

this is tech, yes, but more is not always best. A GPU can only handle so much, try to add more then it doesn't need is a waste of money. Once you actually go into using more vram then 2GB, the core is the thing that is struggling and NOT so much the vram, so having more won't help the lag, as your going to have it no matter what.

such a huge difference isn't there?????

http://www.legitreviews.com/gigabyte-geforce-gtx-760-4gb-video-card-review-2gb-4gb_129062/4

no difference at all!

From that the 2GB in BF4 which is claimed to use 2.2GB, beats the 4GB, no argument in your favour.

This is not a comprehensive or reliable review in my opinion.

Did you read the comments from the readers below?

 

[mr91]

prove your argument!

There is no difference, it's proven.

Your questionable review site that Tested BF4 when it just came out and was full of bugs doesn't mean much.

I don't think you have too much experience with different hardware configurations and are relaying on review sites that don't give readers the whole picture and are misleading.

 

[mr91]

Look @ the COD ghosts recommended settings below - do you see the gtx 760 4gb?



Recommended System Requirements:
•OS: Windows 7 64-Bit / Windows 8 64-Bit
•CPU: Intel® Core™ i5 – 680 @ 3.6GHz
•RAM: 8 GB RAM
•HDD : 40 GB HD space
•Video: NVIDIA® GeForce™ GTX 760 @ 4GB
•Sound: DirectX® compatible sound card
•DirectX®: DirectX® 11
•Internet: Broadband connection and service required for Multiplayer Connectivity. Internet connection required for activation.


http://community.callofduty.com/thread/200786048

Doesn't even matter, do your research.

This game isn't very well optimized for PC however there is a reason the developer recommended the 4g gtx 760.

This game without AA uses 2.5 GB of VRam.

Do you think you know more than the developer?

 

[Zodiakku]

The short answer is yes.You'll max everything on 1080p,but 1440p won't be flawless in every situation(i.e. Crysis 3 with 1000x MSAA...).

 

[mr91]

yes?, but that is from the point. the R9 290X is completely different from the GTX 760 4GB, completely.

Stop making up other random excuses, face the fact, you and mr91 are wrong.

You're wrong!

You think you know everything - have you ever done testing with other hardware configurations?

Have you played games like ghost's and BF4?

Did you read the Tomshardware Articles that mentioned some of the effects when video cards don't have enough vram.

What experience do you have in this industry?

 

[mr91]

The short answer is yes.You'll max everything on 1080p,but 1440p won't be flawless in every situation(i.e. Crysis 3 with 1000x MSAA...).

Crysis 3 maxed out @ 1080p with 8x msaa uses over 2.3 gb of VRAM, I tried it yesterday when helping somebody else.

Most of the challenge's would be in 1440p gaming.

 

[mr91]

always best to offer an opinion.

You don't why should anybody else?

 

[mr91]

feel like is not always what is, the 2GB GTX 760 is the best choice.

We have a testimonial - Have you have done testing with 760 sli?

I forgot, you rely on questionable review sites for your knowledge. lol

 

[mr91]

I had gtx 760 sli and while it was nice It left me wanting more. kept setup for about a week. I have three HP z23i monitiors, not to hijack this thread anymore but the op selection should be fine. The gtx 760 sli was powerful enough it just felt like it was running of memory, I had 2gb models, evga

Did you monitor your Vram?

Did you get stuttering?

What made you feeling you were running out of VRAM?

 

[Zodiakku]

The short answer is yes.You'll max everything on 1080p,but 1440p won't be flawless in every situation(i.e. Crysis 3 with 1000x MSAA...).

Crysis 3 maxed out @ 1080p with 8x msaa uses over 2.3 gb of VRAM, I tried it yesterday when helping somebody else.

Most of the challenge's would be in 1440p gaming.

About that 2.3 gb of VRAM,is that just VRAM allocation or is it actually using all of that ?

 

[unknownofprob]

mr91, you have to be kidding me. You have shown not ONE true example to support your statements, not ONE!!!!

Words mean nothing without hardcore facts.

"This is not a comprehensive or reliable review in my opinion.

Seriously? Is that all you can say?, your opinion is totally wrong!!

Do you want more reviews??

 

[mr91]

mr91, you have to be kidding me. You have shown not ONE true example to support your statements, not ONE!!!!

Words mean nothing without hardcore facts.

"This is not a comprehensive or reliable review in my opinion.

Seriously? Is that all you can say?, your opinion is totally wrong!!

Do you want more reviews??

You're entitled your opinion however I disagree.

What games have you played?
What other configurations have you tested?

Are you afraid to answer my questions?

Here is an opinion from an owner of 2 770's from another thread

 

[mr91]

have two GTX 770 4GB cards myself, and my monitor is 1440p so I can definitely give you a solid opinion.

My opinion is, get the 4GB version. Here's why.. Although no game currently even comes close to using 4GB of VRAM for rendering purposes, there are some games that will use the extra VRAM you have to cache textures, shaders etcetera.

This can result in additional benefits, such as faster loading, and less stuttering and hitching during gameplay. A few games that I've played that do this are Crysis 3, BF4 and Bioshock Infinite. All of them preload and cache assets.

With even bigger games due out this year (Dragon Age Inquisition, Witcher 3, Watch Dogs etcetera), VRAM will be even more important for smooth hitch free gaming.

Another reason to get the 4GB version is mods. If you play games like Skyrim, and GTA IV (GTA V is due out this year supposedly as well), you can mod the hell out of those games with very detailed textures that eat up lots of VRAM.

 

[mr91]

mr91, you have to be kidding me. You have shown not ONE true example to support your statements, not ONE!!!!

Words mean nothing without hardcore facts.

"This is not a comprehensive or reliable review in my opinion.

Seriously? Is that all you can say?, your opinion is totally wrong!!

Do you want more reviews??

Who made you the leading authority on technology?

 

[mr91]

You didn't read my links.

Why did you go with the 4930k?

It's a great platform and processor, I'm just curious why you chose this option.

 

[mr91]

mr91, you have to be kidding me. You have shown not ONE true example to support your statements, not ONE!!!!

Words mean nothing without hardcore facts.

"This is not a comprehensive or reliable review in my opinion.

Seriously? Is that all you can say?, your opinion is totally wrong!!

Do you want more reviews??

The review sites are not nessarly factual. Can you show me something from a reputable site like Tomshardware that supports your assertions?

I showed you links from Tomsharware.

 

[bystander]

mr91, you have to be kidding me. You have shown not ONE true example to support your statements, not ONE!!!!

Words mean nothing without hardcore facts.

"This is not a comprehensive or reliable review in my opinion.

Seriously? Is that all you can say?, your opinion is totally wrong!!

Do you want more reviews??

Who made you the leading authority on technology?

This is kind of funny coming from you. You've now shot down a few sites that disagree with your opinion, but you don't except any of them, and have yet to show anything but your own testimonial as proof to back up your claims.

Clearly you hold your opinion over anyone else, but what is really hypocritical is that you attack someone else for claiming to be the authority with review sites to back him up while you are claiming to be the authority with nothing but your own testimonial as proof.

 

[mr91]

mr91, you have to be kidding me. You have shown not ONE true example to support your statements, not ONE!!!!

Words mean nothing without hardcore facts.

"This is not a comprehensive or reliable review in my opinion.

Seriously? Is that all you can say?, your opinion is totally wrong!!

Do you want more reviews??

Who made you the leading authority on technology?

This is kind of funny coming from you. You've now shot down a few sites that disagree with your opinion, but you don't except any of them, and have yet to show anything but your own testimonial as proof to back up your claims.

Clearly you hold your opinion over anyone else, but what is really hypocritical is that you attack someone else for claiming to be the authority with review sites to back him up while you are claiming to be the authority with nothing but your own testimonial as proof.

You're are also entitled to your opinion however in my opinion you lack the knowledge and hands on experience to make such a assertion.

 

[Zodiakku]

Please don't feed the troll.OP has probably made his decision already.

 

[mr91]

Please don't feed the troll.OP has probably made his decision already.

I agree! No point educating people that think they know everything.
Lol

I will stop interacting with them.

If the op has questions then I will gladly answer them.

 

[Zodiakku]

I was actually talking about you if i'm honest 😀

 

[mr91]

I was actually talking about you if i'm honest 😀

Lol