[citation][nom]thrasherbill[/nom]"" After all, the main difference between an Imac and a regular PC for photoshop is the Imacs excellent monitor.""Funny how people stand by this argument and the screens themselves have never been made by apple now its Lg for the longest time it was sony, Im always amused at this argument (it gets tossed around alot!) as one of the reasons for apples superiority in the graphics market when all they did was ask for a pretty case around the screen of a monitor you can buy and use on any system and probably far cheaper too[/citation]
I generally giggle to myself when people talk about the great Apple IPS displays being the second coming. There are FAR better IPS displays out there than Apple's with much faster response times and better color accuracy. Apple displays are only a middle of the road quality S-IPS (sometimes they're H-IPS) screen. Of course, you really have to know what you're doing to buy the right thing or you'll end up with a crappy IPS, they're definitely not all created equal (even though most of them are created by LG/Phillips). For graphics work, IPS are pretty much the way to go as their color accuracy from off-center viewing is the best (and you can usually touch them without distorting the image). However, for gaming or movies (where you're not doing much off-center viewing), I generally recommend VA screens, as they're cheaper, have better viewing angles and contrast than TN (usually mid to high 170s viewing angles and occasionally have better blacks than cheaper IPSes), and you can buy ones with fast response times for much less than a fast response time S-IPS of equal size. You can get a decent S-M/PVA monitor for half to a third the price of a high quality, fast response time S-IPS.