tamalero
Distinguished
Many people confuse true overclocking (that is measured in percentage) with the MHz they OC; Core2 now is the king of that too, but in the past, people used to send a Pentium4/D to 4.0GHz and considered it an incredible OC while seldom being impressed by a 2.8GHz X2/A64, even if the OC of the latter was better; 200MHz OC of an Athlon are still better than 300MHz OC of a Pentium4/D.I have had both through the years including today, and granted, Netburst was an oven which I avoided thanks to AMD, but generally, I have experienced higher overclocks and greater system stability with intel than my AMD systems, and I rarely skimp on components...
And as for system stability, I don't think AMD has been that far fron Intel since the K8 was out.
let's not forget that most inestability was caused by terrible VIA Chipsets when at tha ttime, these were of the very few solutions in mobo chipsets for AMD...
And secondly, you either have wayyyyy to much time on your hands, hope some AMD staff member is going to notice you and give you a coaster for brown nosing their brand
I assume by "coaster" you mean Athlon X2, because that's just about all they're good for nowadays. :lol:just kidding but i like aggravating amd fanboys
and you guys still say you didnt come here to flamewar?
jesus.....
I seriusly dont want to see what you guys do thats called "flamewar"...
/uses best Tim Allen impersonation
You are a sad strange little man and you have my pity. Farewell!
let me help you with a macro!!!!

MR.T Pities the fools!!!
viper: Good examples, also remember the exorbitant prices AMD used to charge for it's FX series processors because they didn't have competition.
urgh???
didnt Intel have the same prices in their Pentium 4 EE?
common :|
I remember they all were around the 1299 mark and 1099 mark..
I know I am right about AMD being superior
egads, this guy sounds like sharikou 😵