News AMD CEO to Negotiate 2nm, 3nm Chip Supplies With TSMC

[Admin]

Lisa Su Heads to Taiwan to discuss 2nm and 3nm allocation and advanced packaging with TSMC and Ase Technology.

AMD CEO to Negotiate 2nm, 3nm Chip Supplies With TSMC : Read more

 

[HideOut]

How is this headline worthy? If they were not in negotiations for future tech they'd be the biggest idiots on the planet. Its kina a "no <Mod Edit> sherlock" statement.

 

[DougMcC]

How is this headline worthy? If they were not in negotiations for future tech they'd be the biggest idiots on the planet. Its kina a "no <Mod Edit> sherlock" statement.

They could also have been found to be in negotiations with a different foundry, but weren't. Confirmation of no change is important to the industry, even if change would be more dramatic.

 

[waltc3]

"AMD's impressive success in recent years is enabled mainly by TSMC's ability to produce chips in high volume using its highly competitive process technologies."

Partially true. AMD's success also rests on its ability to innovate and design unique architectures that it can produce using TSMC's fabs and AMD's so-far unequaled ability to execute on its plans and actually produce and ship its products on schedule. Like with most everything else, Intel sat back and allowed TSMC and AMD to fly right past them. It's that old bugaboo--monopolistic thinking, that only works when you are a monopoly, that has set Intel back so far. AMD otoh has never been in a position to develop a monopolistic attitude--it always been pedal-to-the-metal competition for AMD. Watching Intel struggle to compete is nothing if not entertaining. I think this time, though, Gelsinger knows that AMD has no intention of slowing down--as was the unfortunate case with AMD post Opteron.

 

[JayNor]

As long as we're guessing ... AMD could be stopping by to talk to MediaTek about a wifi7 chiplet, since AMD doesn't appear to have their own IP.

 

[zx128k]

Intel are going to be ahead of TSMC in the coming years. AMD need access to the most cutting edge if they have any hope.

 

[waltc3]

I don't see any news here. Just someone who for some reason doesn't think AMD knows what to do with itself... Interesting to note that while most news centers around the products and tech AMD is shipping today, much of Intel commentary centers around vaporware shipping at some future date. That could be because that is what 90% of Intel PR is centered on these days. Intel FABs have been struggling to catch up with TSMC for the last five years, unsuccessfully, too, I might add. But some people can't let go of the Intel myth, for some reason--much like Apple's fan base. The central problem for Intel for the last several years and moving forward is its corporate structure. Intel is still trying to learn how to compete with another very strong and very competitive company--Intel's entire organization is built on monolithic, monopolist thinking, because that's what Intel was for the decade prior to Zen2 from AMD. OTOH, AMD is a lean, mean engineering machine that has never known anything but raw competition in its history. Both companies will work and produce according to their corporate structures, imo. I do not see Intel's current CEO as especially apt as he was pulled from Intel's halcyon, monopolist days, which have long passed.

 

[zx128k]

I don't see any news here. Just someone who for some reason doesn't think AMD knows what to do with itself... Interesting to note that while most news centers around the products and tech AMD is shipping today, much of Intel commentary centers around vaporware shipping at some future date. That could be because that is what 90% of Intel PR is centered on these days. Intel FABs have been struggling to catch up with TSMC for the last five years, unsuccessfully, too, I might add. But some people can't let go of the Intel myth, for some reason--much like Apple's fan base. The central problem for Intel for the last several years and moving forward is its corporate structure. Intel is still trying to learn how to compete with another very strong and very competitive company--Intel's entire organization is built on monolithic, monopolist thinking, because that's what Intel was for the decade prior to Zen2 from AMD. OTOH, AMD is a lean, mean engineering machine that has never known anything but raw competition in its history. Both companies will work and produce according to their corporate structures, imo. I do not see Intel's current CEO as especially apt as he was pulled from Intel's halcyon, monopolist days, which have long passed.

Intel have partnered with ASML to bring the next generation to market. Intel’s production manufacturing with High-NA EUV is beginning in 2025.

EUV 0.55 NA has been designed to enable multiple future nodes beginning in 2025 as the industry’s first deployment, followed by memory technologies at similar density.

Industry watchers said Intel will likely use the new machines to make more advanced 2 nm chips.

The latest EUV machine’s technology is more advanced than the equipment with which top foundry player Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. produces chips via its 3-nanometer chip processing node.

Thus, AMD need access to the most cutting edge from TSMC. I hope what I said makes sense now.

 

[TJ Hooker]

Intel have partnered with ASML to bring the next generation to market. Intel’s production manufacturing with High-NA EUV is beginning in 2025.

EUV 0.55 NA has been designed to enable multiple future nodes beginning in 2025 as the industry’s first deployment, followed by memory technologies at similar density.

Industry watchers said Intel will likely use the new machines to make more advanced 2 nm chips.

The latest EUV machine’s technology is more advanced than the equipment with which top foundry player Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. produces chips via its 3-nanometer chip processing node.

Stating that the equipment Intel will be using in 2025 (at the earliest) will be more advanced than the equipment TSMC is using today (and for some time already) doesn't seem particularly impressive. TSMC will be moving to high NA machines in the future as well.

 

[zx128k]

Stating that the equipment Intel will be using in 2025 (at the earliest) will be more advanced than the equipment TSMC is using today (and for some time already) doesn't seem particularly impressive. TSMC will be moving to high NA machines in the future as well.

The thing is, Intel is working with ASML. They are partners developing this new process. Intel will be first to be able to manufacture under the new process. TSMC buys their lithography machines from ASML, they too are partners.

AMD have to go to TSMC for chip manufacture, they have to fight with Apple and the rest for cutting edge chips. Apple have booked close to 90% of TSMC's 3nm production. Apple is gradually monopolizing TSMC.

Without Apple as a predictable, high volume, and demanding client, it is unlikely that TSMC would have been able to catch up to Intel on advanced node semiconductor manufacturing.

At the moment, Apple is a priority for TSMC. When there are huge price increases, TSMC gives Apple huge subsidies. This means that Apple and the other brands can not be on a level playing field.

TSMCs 3nm yeild is just 55%. TSMC 3nm chip production can’t keep up with Apple demand.