griptwister :
Does anyone know if AMD has a GPU planned to answer to the GTX Titan (or GTX 785).
They don't need to, the Titan represents very poor value for money and according to the rumors the HD8970 and GTX 780 will be equally if not more powerful at a lower cost. This was Nvidia's cheap trick to claim single fastest GPU and to try milk revenue in a very slow year for GPU's.
Cazalan :
That would be AMD's dream if it were true. Intel isn't targeting the performance market, they're targeting everything. From tiny Atom SoC's to cheap Celerons/Pentiums, to Xeons. Products from $12 to $4000.
And how many Intel low cost solutions actually represent good value for money over an entire setup, sure they have x86 performance but thats about it. The rest is dull and drab and the quality of Motherboards down in the $50-120 range is beyond shocking. If a person has only $250 odd for board, chip and RAM AMD offerings make far more sense. It is why Intel apart from on Toms and Anandtech occupy no market sub $200 because their offerings are just BORING.
mayankleoboy1 :
Is that 15% IPC improvement, or 15% improvement stock clocks Vs. stock clocks ? If that 15% is 5% IPC+10% clocks, SR is mostly meh. If that 15% is pure IPC , its going to be quite an achievement. Power consumption be damned.
Kaviri iGPU is touted at 50% over Trinity, 35-40% over Richland, that is very size able.
Which also means that Richland is mostly a "sidegrade" over Trinity ? (1.5*100/1.35 = 1.11 )
Just saying, but if someone has bought a Trinity, and then buys a Richland , he will prolly going to be disappointed by the sidegrade. So how will AMD convince him to buy Kaveri ?
1) Not really sure, talk about overall general computing performance. Some sources say 15% others 30% but I do think AMD are setting for a minimum of 15% accross the board and throught the product line over previous parts. I have tediously sat and done the math on flat 15%. While single threaded performance will still be behind Intel, the rest of the performance differentials are very good. What has not been looked at is the factor of what AMD are doing with Cache and IMC improvements and the effect that will have. Overall if SR sits in and around that SB/IB territory it will be quite impressive.
As for power, SR is expected to utilize RCM so will see the proper benefits of it, I would assume though the power numbers will drop irrespective.
2) If you don't own a Trinity part then Richland is very feasible to go to, it has enough performance yields to be a step up on Trinity without costing more.
5-7% CPU gains, 15-20% IGPU gains and around 10% better IMC overall probably 7-10% better