AMD First to 22 Nm, Challenges Intel

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.
um, overclocking margins isn't a magic word that gets more magical when you microsize... they up the speeds accordingly when manufacturing the new parts see, or they'll just be the old parts made smaller (and indeed better for overclocking)..
the margin for overclocking remains forever the same :)
 
[citation][nom]grieve[/nom]My Money is on Intel... UnfortunatelyAMD will be lucky if there producing processors come 2011[/citation]

That's your mistake. ntel does not require your support; not do they care about you. They have hurt you and now you reward them? Additionally you do not need ntel. The other company is much more innovative - keep watching. Intel is following AMD.

Question the marketing machine - talk, misleading talk - you speak like you know because they have told you what to say. It is called training parrots. Wait for the releases and see the truth - beyond the biased carefully selected tests - one of the biggest bias areas is test conditions that can be easily adapted to illustrate through slight of hand. Anadtech is the worst for making ntel look good, and especially for making AMD look bad. The 2 are closer than you think. Not that 2, the other 2.
 
Dudes chill ... consortium's always make announcements like this. Just be glad it is actually happening. Christ look at what competition recently yielded within the graphics segment, I can not if I choose to buy a 9800GTX for less than 200$ easy. I have even seen a few @ 150. Intel C2D's slowly track downward in price ... why is that? For the same reason NVIDIA never saw fit to grace us with a steep early discounts until the 4850 was released... lack of competition.

I am not sure why all the hate springs forth at any positive message towards AMD ... when in the end it is your and mine best interests to have healthy competition.
 
[citation][nom]ZootyGray[/nom]That's your mistake. ntel does not require your support; not do they care about you. They have hurt you and now you reward them? Additionally you do not need ntel. The other company is much more innovative - keep watching. Intel is following AMD. Question the marketing machine - talk, misleading talk - you speak like you know because they have told you what to say. It is called training parrots. Wait for the releases and see the truth - beyond the biased carefully selected tests - one of the biggest bias areas is test conditions that can be easily adapted to illustrate through slight of hand. Anadtech is the worst for making ntel look good, and especially for making AMD look bad. The 2 are closer than you think. Not that 2, the other 2.[/citation]
...While innovating,their CPU's themselves aren't changing.Research and development please???
I'm tired of your spam of AMD fanboyism,it's really getting old,besides.Prove AMD is literally(NOT THEORITICALLY) better(right now,and when the new processors are released from both sides).I could give you a loan,perhaps 😉
 
[citation][nom]ZootyGray[/nom]That's your mistake. ntel does not require your support; not do they care about you. They have hurt you and now you reward them? Additionally you do not need ntel. The other company is much more innovative - keep watching. Intel is following AMD. Question the marketing machine - talk, misleading talk - you speak like you know because they have told you what to say. It is called training parrots. Wait for the releases and see the truth - beyond the biased carefully selected tests - one of the biggest bias areas is test conditions that can be easily adapted to illustrate through slight of hand. Anadtech is the worst for making ntel look good, and especially for making AMD look bad. The 2 are closer than you think. Not that 2, the other 2.[/citation]
Oh yeah,actually another note.Intel's stock.They have it.It's a good stock to invest in,unlike AMD.
 
Amd should just skip 45nm and 30nm and focus on releasing in about two years because current architecture is crap compared to c2d. Is this a different architecture or just a die shrink?
 
^This has nothing to do with any specific processor, just a manufacturing node. Of course, AMD should have a new architecture out by the time they move to 22nm.
 
When processor get smaller thats will increase the performance
and make alto space for add more registry and the the cpu bus get smaller and faster .
because their is less lag in data transform

 
Status
Not open for further replies.