AMD FX-6100 vs intel i5 2500k

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sort by date Sort by votes


Just like Intel Hyperthreading, the second core of a BD module is NOT a full core. Its a SMT implementation, just like Hyperthreading is. So just like a i7 2600 only has four full cores [despite having eight register stacks], a 8xxx BD has four full cores, despite the fact most of the hardware is duplicated. Granted, AMD's CMT implementation is more powerful then Intels HTT, but it still carries a ~20% performance penalty.

So when AMD markets the "worlds first [consumer] 8 core CPU", they are doing typical marketing spin.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
so that means amd fx-8xxx have only 4 cores, but marketed as 8 core (i.e, 8c/8t), but in fact it is a quad core (4c/8t)

and a 4 core intel i7 have 4 core and marketed as a quad core and is really a quad core , but can process 8 thread i.e, 4c/8t

looks like amd is playing a game
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
I will say this: Intel HTT is about 20% effective, AMD CMT is about 80% effective. But the fact remains: the second core of a BD module is NOT a full core, and its ironic after playing this down prior to the BD launch, AMD is complaining that Windows actually USES that second core, costing performance. [Hence the "Windows 8 will fix BD" talk thats going around now...]
 
Upvote 0 Downvote


No such thing as "future proof"
The 6100 will be obsolete before games can utilize 6 cores.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote


Oh dear.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
i would say, go for the 8120 or 6100 if you do not care about your electricity bills, they uses tad more power in loads than the i5 or i7, infact in full load, they do not use that much power.
i5 2500k imo is the best price to performace ratio cpu for best performance and still using far less power than amd.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
I just Completed my FX6100 w/ 990FXA-G65 and ran PASSMARK 7 against i7 2600k. The results were as follows in the CPU test:

i7 2600k @3.40 Ghz 3400
FX6100 @4.0 Ghz 3300

With that said, i havent even begun to hit this processors potential. With water cooling I am running a cool 28 C. at 4.0 Ghz!!!
I will submit screenshots if your not satisfied.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote


Now compare with a 2600k overclocked to 4.0ghz.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote


you seem to have wrong info
checkout the passmark here
http://www.cpubenchmark.net/high_end_cpus.html
 
Upvote 0 Downvote


if you want very high end cpu then go for sandy-e lga2011 and forget about upgrade (high priority)
otherwise wait for ivy and then buy it or buy sandy now and upgrade it to ivy later if you want to (but their will be no need of it)
but do not go for that bd
or wait for pd and get yourself a window 8
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Im giving you my clock specifications, numbers don't lie. Also to note, i7 2600k has a very difficult time getting up to 4.0 unless you have a very high end mobo, but even then stability is a coin toss.

I'd say 4.3 and im sitting at i7 2600k. I am comparing my system build to whom ever posts the scores online (primarily CPU) Im still sitting nice at 28C. I have 20C. more before I have to stop, we'll see where this goes. ^_^

I will admit that the single thread is a bummer, however I am looking to make up for that short coming, and it looks like I am becoming more successful.

Keep in mind there are three types of BD 6 Core Processors.

FX6100 XUMB - 4.0Ghz
16Gb - 1600 Corsair
MSI FXA990-G65
 
Upvote 0 Downvote


fx6100 is not a six core . it is a 3 core (module) but process 6 threads and so works as a 6 core using multi threading.
their ai'nt not 6c bd
fx-8xxx is a 4c/8t processor
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
It has 6 integer units and 6 floating points, Its has 6 physical cores, however its uses resources differently than say standard coded quad core. Everyone needs to focus on the end potential of this CPU, Windows 7 will be receiving an update with micro coding for the FX series, this alone is supposed to increase performance by 10% +. Also I would like to point out what happened with Pentium M, Nehalem Chip!!! Exact same shoes AMD is in now, Look how popular, and successful that chip has become.

AMD is in the same exact footsteps as Intel once was, This processor is already showing excellent potential; I am 100 points behind an i7 2600k. Now granted there aren't a lot of applications to take advantage of the MT, but everything comes in due time.

I believe AMD is going to get away from K10 with this tech, its only a matter of time, and when they do This thing will be a Beast.
Once the standard programming for the chip goes into affect, it will Eclipse the 1100t.

I will say that i am happy that with all the negativity my underdog fell short of an i7 2600k by 100 points, I am not complaining one bit, all I ask is that you look at this situation with some critical thought. It makes me wonder what performance I would get with the new micro code?!

FX6100 XUMB - 4.0Ghz - 27C.
Corsair 16Gb RAM - 1600Mhz
MSI FXA990-GD65
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
i7-3960 is over $1000, a decent mobo will run you roughly $300+, now referring back to what I said earlier, the micro code isn't even complete on the CPU, on top of that the standard coding isn't released.

Focusing back on our main topic, my FX6100 is 100 points behind i7-2600k (3300/3400) With the update, it will boost performance by 10%+, which will naturally push my beyond the i7-2600k.

I am sitting at 28C standard operation, playing games and running my programs. This leaves tons of head room to push this system to the max. Don't be so quick to cut and run, this chip has got some series performance hidden away.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote

Stop trying to fool people with Passmark results.

Check out these reviews and see how uninspiring the FX6100 is.

http://www.guru3d.com/article/amd-fx-8150--8120-6100-and-4100-performance-review/1

http://www.legionhardware.com/articles_pages/amd_fx_8150fx_8120fx_6100_and_fx_4170,1.html


 
Upvote 0 Downvote
You can't base my Setup with their setup for starters, second there is no "pulling the wool" over anyone's eyes. Passmark is used by all major leading benchmark testers for setup and comparison. Considering your urgency in calling me a liar I will assume your an Intel Fanboy, and I will advice people who are open minded to keep your comments from their consideration.

There is no denying what high potential this architecture has, nor the fact that my build is getting close to i7-2600k builds, you'll find my system in the top 20 setups ( as of 8 hours ago) So before you come in swinging Chad Boga, I will reiterate that there are 3 different types of the 6 Core BD, I will also reassure that no two chips are the same.

Who are you to say what this processor is capable of, all you have is hear say, you havent tested it, you were not present during the "tests you posted." All you have is circumstantial information, that for all we know was posted by people much like yourself.

Granted at stock speeds the BD doesnt compare, but with proper OC, and adjustments on timings, an AMD user can get very close to the i7-2600k (minor discrepancies aside) The potential of this CPU is undeniable. I have no reason to lie to anyone, I am simply bringing my observation, and physical hands on experience in on this forum.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Status
Not open for further replies.

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts

Moderators online

Share this page

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom