AMD-FX-8350 vs. Intel-i5-4460

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

RamboPenguin

Reputable
Sep 8, 2015
47
0
4,530
I'm having a really tough time deciding between these two CPUs. I am building a desktop computer that will be used to play games like skyrim, tf2, Shadow of Mordor, the 2015 star wars battlefront, and some other triple a games that may come out in the future. It will also be used for school so I will need it to not be slow when I use things like Word, Chrome, and the occasional video editing. I would really not like it if the computer lagged when I used things like Word or Google Chrome. I'm coming from an i3 laptop and I just do not want to purchase something that will have the same kind of performance as that.

The fx-8350 is slightly better at everything except single core performance and it's power consumption/temperature. It is also a lot older (being released in 2012) It is also very good at overclocking, however I will not be utilizing that feature at all (mostly because I have absolutely no idea how to do that). Cost- ~ $163.00
The i5 is the "name-brand" and has a slightly higher single-core performance. (released in 2014) Cost- ~ $176.00

Both CPUs would be paired with an R9 380 gpu (4gb version). I just need some facts that can help me decide between these two. I've tried deciding on other forums but they are all biased there so I would really appreciate some cold hard facts about each brand or chip.

If there is a AMD cpu equal to or greater than the 8350 for an equal or teeny tiny bit more money (like no more than 10-15 dollars) then please list it down below.

So which cpu would be better for me; a student and gamer? Is the 8-core necessary and will it slow my speed down if I don't use all 8 frequently. Does the i5 not have enough processing capability for the games I want to play. I know it does have enough for word, chrome, and video editing.

Anyways thanks, I hope you guys can help me make a final decision on what cpu I should get for my first pc build.




 
Solution


For 1080P gaming anything above 2 GB is an overkill.
 


I would disagree, there are plenty of games that my 3gb card will chew up near 2700mb. If that was a 2gb card its spilling into slower system ram causing slowdowns and stuttering. 3gb seems to be the magic number for 1080p though as i cant ever crack 3gb.
 


Overkill is definitely an exaggerated statement, my apologies. However for GPU's that have 2 GB and 4 GB options if you compare the fps difference it is next to non existing.

It's a waste of money in my opinion.
 


if there was a significant diff in price, sure it might be a waste of money, but if 3 or 4gb is in budget range i would go with that. I think 2gb has had it's day, you will be turning down settings to keep things playable. One thing i have found based on reviews around various sites, is that nvidia's architecture actually tends to use less vram with the same in-game settings, just some food for thought. Their memory management might be a little better.
 


yah but then all you gotta do is pay an extra 100+ dollars for equal or less performance
 
It means that the new api will allow the fx 8350 to whoop some ass. Directx 12 will allow a game to utilise more cores/ threads giving a big performance in games to a processor like the fx 8350. Overall, it's gonna boost the dos of games but I'm not sure by how much- maybe enough to allow fx CPUs to beat Intel CPUs