rgrigio :
Hmm... Should i expect any of these IGPUs to perform better than an old HD6770 Gddr5?
Probably, yeah. Sure, it's a cut-down Vega, but it seems to have slightly better computing power than the 6770, plus it's compatible with newer versions of OpenCL (v2.2. instead of v1.2), OpenGL (v4.5 instead v4.4), Shader Model (v6.0 instead of 5.0), DirectX (Direct3D v12.0 instead of v11.0), plus support for Vulkan & SPIR-V.
rgrigio :
Hmm... Should i expect any of these IGPUs to perform better than an old HD6770 Gddr5?
captaincharisma :
i don't see any mention of these APU's having their own dedicated video memory so if that is the case then they shouldn't perform that much better then previous APU graphics cores.
I highly doubt that. The prior desktop APUs, even the ones using the Socket AM4 platform, were 2C/4T
Excavator-based CPUs (i.e. slightly improved Steamroller chips akin to the old FX line) using
R7 onboard graphics (i.e. R7 250/350). So you're getting a much better base CPU (the 2400G being roughly comparable to the R5 1500X/1500 Pro, the 2200G essentially is the R3 1300X/1300 Pro), with access to faster RAM, & a better graphics package. Barring something being severely gimped on the driver side or chipset, you're talking about having an APU that on the graphics side is probably at least comparable to the GT 1030 (& could potentially maybe even match up to the GTX 1050/1050TI or RX 560), with a very decent Ryzen CPU.