godbrother Distinguished Aug 22, 2009 1,023 0 19,290 Nov 15, 2009 #1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D11uY5dOE2c http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XDdvZkBo4JE&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D11uY5dOE2c http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XDdvZkBo4JE&feature=related
jimmysmitty Champion Oct 5, 2007 21,598 599 59,140 Nov 15, 2009 #2 Not bad. 30%. Bet when drivers and programs (server) get optimized we should see more like a 50% performance boost. Wonder if any is IPC or if its all due to the cores itself.
Not bad. 30%. Bet when drivers and programs (server) get optimized we should see more like a 50% performance boost. Wonder if any is IPC or if its all due to the cores itself.
godbrother Distinguished Aug 22, 2009 1,023 0 19,290 Nov 15, 2009 #3 jimmysmitty : Not bad. 30%. Bet when drivers and programs (server) get optimized we should see more like a 50% performance boost. Wonder if any is IPC or if its all due to the cores itself. They should have bought it out when i7 came out to compete with. Bringing it out a year later is a little pointless but hey, you can't win em all.
jimmysmitty : Not bad. 30%. Bet when drivers and programs (server) get optimized we should see more like a 50% performance boost. Wonder if any is IPC or if its all due to the cores itself. They should have bought it out when i7 came out to compete with. Bringing it out a year later is a little pointless but hey, you can't win em all.
jimmysmitty Champion Oct 5, 2007 21,598 599 59,140 Nov 15, 2009 #4 I think AMD had to wait for a smaller procss node just like how Intels 6 core will be 32nm as well. If they can push the IPC then its fine. But in the market its in it will have stiff competition from Core i7/i9 sinc i9 will be a LGA1366 drop in.
I think AMD had to wait for a smaller procss node just like how Intels 6 core will be 32nm as well. If they can push the IPC then its fine. But in the market its in it will have stiff competition from Core i7/i9 sinc i9 will be a LGA1366 drop in.
jennyh Splendid Mar 3, 2009 4,292 0 22,860 Nov 16, 2009 #5 This is istanbul, it's been out for a few months now already. Are you confusing it with Thuban, the 6-core desktop?
This is istanbul, it's been out for a few months now already. Are you confusing it with Thuban, the 6-core desktop?
alikum Distinguished Nov 28, 2008 674 0 19,010 Nov 16, 2009 #6 +1 to jennyh Commercial/desktop 6-cores is called Thuban. Istanbul is for the server segment.
L loneninja Distinguished Jan 8, 2009 2,184 1 20,160 Nov 16, 2009 #7 Istanbul has been out for a few months, it's and opteron, not Phenom.
jimmysmitty Champion Oct 5, 2007 21,598 599 59,140 Nov 16, 2009 #8 jennyh : This is istanbul, it's been out for a few months now already. Are you confusing it with Thuban, the 6-core desktop? And what would the difference be, well besides socket maybe. Other than that its the same exact CPU core just like how Xeon is the same as Core i7.
jennyh : This is istanbul, it's been out for a few months now already. Are you confusing it with Thuban, the 6-core desktop? And what would the difference be, well besides socket maybe. Other than that its the same exact CPU core just like how Xeon is the same as Core i7.
xaira Distinguished Aug 6, 2008 2,384 0 19,960 Nov 16, 2009 #9 thuban is a revised istanbul with lower thermals and ddr3 support, thats y its not out yet.
A Amiga500 Distinguished Jul 3, 2007 631 0 18,980 Nov 16, 2009 #10 jimmysmitty : And what would the difference be, well besides socket maybe. Other than that its the same exact CPU core just like how Xeon is the same as Core i7. Potentially very different cache look-ups. Also, doesn't Istanbul have another Hypertransport ring for socket to socket communications? (or is that for quad socket procs only...)
jimmysmitty : And what would the difference be, well besides socket maybe. Other than that its the same exact CPU core just like how Xeon is the same as Core i7. Potentially very different cache look-ups. Also, doesn't Istanbul have another Hypertransport ring for socket to socket communications? (or is that for quad socket procs only...)
aznshinobi Splendid Oct 19, 2009 8,772 0 31,460 Nov 16, 2009 #11 Isn't the Thuban called "Bulldozer" too?
xaira Distinguished Aug 6, 2008 2,384 0 19,960 Nov 16, 2009 #12 bulldozer is next gen arch, thuban is current arch, just 2 more cores
jimmysmitty Champion Oct 5, 2007 21,598 599 59,140 Nov 17, 2009 #13 Amiga500 : Potentially very different cache look-ups. Also, doesn't Istanbul have another Hypertransport ring for socket to socket communications? (or is that for quad socket procs only...) Not sure. I would think for quad socket servers yes. But for dual it wont make a difference.
Amiga500 : Potentially very different cache look-ups. Also, doesn't Istanbul have another Hypertransport ring for socket to socket communications? (or is that for quad socket procs only...) Not sure. I would think for quad socket servers yes. But for dual it wont make a difference.
L loneninja Distinguished Jan 8, 2009 2,184 1 20,160 Nov 17, 2009 #14 aznshinobi : Isn't the Thuban called "Bulldozer" too? Thuban is a modified version of Istanbul for the desktop AM3 socket rumored to be called Phenom II X6, it's still a K10 45nm part. Bulldozer is an all new architecture which will be built using 32nm.
aznshinobi : Isn't the Thuban called "Bulldozer" too? Thuban is a modified version of Istanbul for the desktop AM3 socket rumored to be called Phenom II X6, it's still a K10 45nm part. Bulldozer is an all new architecture which will be built using 32nm.