seriously dude.
overclocking feats should be more than the highest number as in clock speed.
overclocking AMD just makes it on par with stock Intel units in terms of IPC / data crunching.
same as HD Radeon
to bad in reality it's not all about clock speed....
I'm sorry Mal, but i'm siding with sarinaide this time, I will have to say that i'm completely confused why everyone thinks the 600 series from nvidia is so great when they can't even get them out the door. This is the reason why Amd is taking market share away from Nvidia on the discrete video card market. To all those Nvidia fans i must say the future does not look that bright for them when Amd APU's are starting to get rid of 100$ video cards and below. Not just Amd either even the Intel 4000HD graphics is making it harder for Amd/Nvidia to compete in the lower-end spectrum, i'd say if you have a Intel ivy their is no reason to buy a 6450/5450 anymore since the onboard graphics are just as good if not better.
Amd has a x86 lease Nvidia does not and they only work with Arm(where is project Denver anyways?)
I agree with sarinaide on the fact that even amd was expecting more from their design. L1/L2 cache on top of the branch prediction and also the low clock speeds(AKA Global foundries) explains why Bulldozer was a bad performer.
I also agree with sarinaide, yes a Amd rig is still capable of doing anything a Intel rig can do...sure it might take a little longer some times but you will NEVER notice it 80% of the time when your on toms complaining about Amd being in second place
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/830bc/830bc40a08f758ad4e93cd5b491982f242da23de" alt="Kaola :kaola: :kaola:"
or watching some 1080P videos or hell even gaming. But i also want Amd to keep it this way not keep falling more and more behind to the point that i notice it during my daily activities.
oh man, piledriver? i gave up on amd.... sorry
oh yeah ummm... expert conjectuer.... uhh.... im at a loss for words in that dept. im just tired of waiting
Then stop waiting Intel has what you want, Piledriver is not going to even make a HUGE difference its just going to be a nice jump in the right direction.
whats going to be the estimated price on piledriver?
As always it should be priced based on its performance and only Amd and some close party's know what that is i'm guessing 270$ and below. If they were smart they would give me a 8 core Piledriver clocked at 4.2Ghz with a nice turbo for 249.99$ or less.
Point [missed] completely????
Since when did 0.00000001% of the market ever matter a damn?
Saying this you must also say that Amd's APU's are great for 80% of the people who do give a damn.
AMD struggles with multi-GPU as it is...............
Again 90% of the time you will never notice this when both rigs are giving you 60+FPS.
For $300 one can buy a much better cpu than could ever make. If the people at think they got something that is going to blow everyone's skirts up then they must be living in some strange dream from their "glory days" to be pricing something like that for $300 that will most likely leave the community even more disappointed than before. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XE0jI5unDOE
I doubt it will cost this much but then again Bulldozer was overpriced by around 20% so who knows.