Viperabyss
Distinguished
AMD already admitted defeat a while ago in their interview.
AMD's 65nm is just trying to close the gap to Intel.
Nothing intresting here, move along.
Wow, you're even LESS educated than what I previously thought, are you some 14-year old? Seriously Wusy, what happened? Weren't you ever right on something?
AMD was keeping right up with Intel @ 130nm vs. their 90nm, same goes with AMD's 90nm vs. 65nm, now when AMD reaches 65nm, Intel will be foced to use 45nm and have to double-time to 32nm to keep up, oh and of course they have to slash prices on their less-performing CPU's as well.
AMD never admitted defeat, AMD stated it was caring more about the Mobile and Server market, because the Desktop is owned currently by K8 and Conroe, as much as everybody loves those Intel benchmarks, still can't keep up with K8.
~~Mad Mod Mike, pimpin' the world 1 rig at a time
You fanboys just don't get it do you?
The five part interview Digitimes had with AMD executive vice president Henri Richard blew it all out.
It was so clear after what AMD saw Conroe was capable they knew it would be a catch up game whether they like it or not. At least the performance gap is nowhere near what we have today between A64 and Netburst.
It all about keeping about the market price down and that's what really matters not who wins.
d00d, weakest insult ever!Wow, you're even LESS educated than what I previously thought, are you some 14-year old?
Intel fanboyz vs. AMD fanboyz
Round 99999999
FIGHT!!