[citation][nom]simple11[/nom]Their hardware isn't targeted to the 'enthusiast' community ie US. It's targeted to the general public who isn't computer literate and who don't need a quad core CPU or a GOOD dedicated GPU. It's not a bug, but a marketing strategy, and judging by their recent quarter, it's working. Can't blame apple for being smart in 1 category. FLAME ON[/citation]
I beg to differ, although I won't flame you or vote you down. Apple's desktops are available in 2, 4, and 8 core configurations, and have good dedicated GPU's, so that argument is out. I consider myself an enthusiast, however I have no desire to be constantly swapping PCI cards, updating drivers, etc. I want a one-vendor solution. One-vendor solutions *always* work better. Always. I'm a UNIX administrator for a living, FYI. We have IBM servers running AIX, HP servers running HP-UX, and some older SGI servers running IRIX. In all three cases, both the hardware, and the operating system come from the same company - they were designed to work together as one, and they do it very well. You get much greater stability and performance when you don't have to support every stupid piece of hardware available, but rather a select few configurations. It works well. I appreciate my Macbook Pro for it's stable one-vendor solution, and also for it's BSD UNIX underpinnings. Most UNIX admins use either OSX or Linux, and won't even consider Windows.