[citation][nom]babybeluga[/nom]Regulas, did you just compare people who use windows to the Democratic party? Are you that jaded? For years, Apple has been the one that is linked to coffee shop liberal elitists. You take any opportunity to berate the democrats on a tech site; you are a crotchety old man who needs to get a life and a brain.And guess what, if you take the hardware in those Dell computers and add up the costs, it comes out where the Microsoft OS costs anywhere from $10 - $50 usually. If you take, say, a Macbook and total its hardware costs, you're pretty much paying $100 - $300 for the operating system.[/citation]
I think he's feeling a little off today, he forgot mention Obama too as per his standard comment format.
Anyway... What I've read from all these posts is basically summarized as "whargrbbl M$ overpriced" and "whargrbbl apple overpriced"
I would argue neither are overpriced as people are buying both. $120 for 7 pro OEM that I will end up using for quite a few years isn't unreasonable to me. If cost is not proportional to demand, then it wouldn't sell. If you can't afford it or it's more than you are willing to pay, that doesn't mean it's overpriced, it just isn't for you. You don't need windows to run your PC, linux is easily available. Same goes for apple and apple products. I, personally, don't see the value, but I don't go spouting off that Macs/ipods are overpriced, it just isn't for me, my 20$ sandisk mp3 player works just fine.
And as far as market value goes, it's funny money value (much like the value of synthetic CDOs) that has little real meaning. It's what people 'think' it's worth, not actual value (the whole market crisis is basically the collapse of what people thought mortgage securities were worth, not necessarily their actual value - as there are still 80-85% of the mortgages that are just fine). I, personally, make my investment choices more on P/E ratios, if I was to choose a single numerical statistic, and 20 is generally a little high.