Are Intel joking re: i3 pricing?

Page 10 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
I think I could set the bus speed to 200MHz, but it obviously wouldn't run that high. My board was an ASUS A7V, it was odd in that you couldn't adjust the vcore and get it to stick after a reboot. But I didn't need to overvolt to get it to 958MHz.
 


Yeah its been brought up. The problem is that AMD has faster CPUs for less money and they have 3 or more motherboards that are cheaper than the cheapest LGA 1156 motherboard with the HD 4200 which is a faster IGP by a decent bit.
 

Understandable but what other CPU out there uses 32nm technology and an IGP?

It should keep OEM system costs down on the whole. So a pricier CPU will in fact be negated (when the market stabilizes) by an abundance of cheaper boards (and for OEMs that means boards will little to no expansion slots).
 


I don't see that happening because of Intel's marketing, they must be more expensive. You are right though, its a decent solution for OEMs, which is Intel's main consumer. The problem is, it doesn't make sense for the independent consumer. System builders will know that there are better alternatives and average Joe wont pay more for 2 cores when he can get 4 cores for the same or less, and in this instance average Joe will have made the right choice. It just doesn't seem like it is a worthwhile chip for the independent consumer.
 



delerious.

thx for your confession my child

in penance, have another beer, and 3 bong hits

and please try really really hard to even sound halfway intelligent
 


I like this penance. 😀
 
You also have no idea how many people are reading this forum every day.

do you?





1. I will never take you seriously because it seems you always post when you're drunk
2 you use the term spintel, so therefore i believe you have no idea what you're talking about if you can't even spell the name of a damn company
3. you are and AMD schill

so again get some sense and then come back with real facts and real numbers




apply that to yourself why don't you make yourself sound atleast a fourth intelligible or is AMD paying you to be stubborn, foolhardy, and absolutely idiotic?

and none of you AMD fans have given me a comparison of the i3 to the Regors. You can compare the triples and quads but that isn't fair to the i3.

one more thing why do you guys obsess over intel being corrupt? how does that change anything in AMD? does it make the phenom II magically better than the i7?

sighq2 and jenny really need to take a step back and think about this thing about logic
 



Now we know you dont want to share what ever the hell it is you are smoking.
 


you don't fool me, sport

when a guy wants to spend big bucks gaming, he doesn't need to squander 100's on spintel mobo, cpu - not when he's buying multi 5870's - and you led him down the garden path to waste money at the house of spintel

the money could have been better spent; maybe still can.

your discreditation is/was also noted - and you continue to burn the bridges

go kiss somebody else

u r a spintel-fud-slinging fanboy

but you seem, at times, to be more intelligent than most - I give you that - but it's what you do with it that undermines

and you know what I mean; others won't; unless they were there - but it doesn't matter - there's a mad dog on your tail - every chance you offer.
 



Definitely quite mad.

Picture022.jpg
 

Why is it that you feel you can call people kiddies or son or whatever diminutive term that crops up in that little head of yours without retort?

How can you logically claim that an individual building a system with multiple ATi Radeon 5870s won't also like to maximize the performance of this said system?

Why doesn't the user simply use a Socket 939 based AMD Athlon64 X2 3800+ with an ATi Xpress 3200 chipset?

Your response would likely be, if you are as bright as you claim you are, that the Athlon64 3800+ is just not powerful enough to feed data to multiple 5870s. In essence, it can run the 5870s but not at their full potential.

What the hell do you think people recommending a Core i7 over a Phenom II X4 are doing in this case?

Simply giving the user the best possible system to feed their multiple 5870s. Fact is that a CPU bottleneck does occur when using multiple 5870s in CrossfireX and the fact of the matter is that an AMD Phenom II X4 bottlenecks far sooner than a Core i7.
 
So... SighQ2 your telling me that NOTHING Intel sells is worth buying, is a decent product, or is has any merit or benefits whatsoever?

I'm not sure what to say to that.
 


ok thanx

I really like Jenny

but I don't like you

I have a natural aversion to egomaniacal goofs. and for that you don't get an award

I am so sincerely sorry /spit

you remind me of myself - your posts are long-winded and never say anything worth reading - but at least from mine, you were able to decipher I am a fan of AMD. I have seen you say similar; but your actions make you a liar; don't worry, you have lots of company to maintain your corrupt existence. Now go away; you are dismissed. Next time speak to bad trip; he might be more empathetic to your self-important, self-indulgent irrelevance.

Hope this helps; but I suspect such a hint is wasted on you.
.

psst = (did you get the real message)?
 


I got mine to 1600 for about 30 seconds - it was like leaning over a stove w a set of knives, ya know?

15 wasn't as extreme. but I ran stock.