That's all well and good to have your own opinion. Just to set the record straight by giving a different opinion, do you think that someone who spends $100 on a quality UPS with AVR and $200 on a quality case with a solid power supply and superb cooling in order to protect their PC so that they can be ensured of it having a long and healthy life will really care about an extra $5 or $10 for a retail CPU over an OEM CPU?The warranty is rather useless IMHO, as the only reason you are going to screw up the cpu is probably one that isnt covered under warranty anyway
I never said that my opinion covered all cases. I just said that I was giving a broader perspective against your opinion that no retail waranty is worth the price increase.Maybe not, but I didnt read he got a $100 UPS nor a $200 case, all I see is that he is in the market for a ~$70 CPU. The price premium for the oem one in this case, can almost buy him a second one.
I have three times. Once with a 486, once with a K6, and once with a P-266. The last one though was Micron's fault. It was a <i>really</i> crappy government PC from Micron with a passive heatsink of all things. I wouldn't have been surprised if it'd been factory overclocked at that. The hardware in that box was <i>all</i> cheap.Also, I've seen tons of PSU's fail, I've seen regular power outages or spikes killing motherboards, but I've never witnessed a cpu die in circumstances that would be covered under warranty.
I most definately would! Are you kidding?If you had a 1 GHz tbird fail on you now, would you bother RMA'ing it ?
a melted cpu is not covered by warranty AFAIK. you operated the cpu beyond its specs, you can't blame AMD for that (well, you could, but it wouldnt help your case).
How does a passive heatsink on a PII 266 make it crappy? I would immagine that the molding to make the large passive heatsink for a pII 266 would cost more than a little dinky heatsink and a 40mm fan. I own a dell with a pII 266, it also uses a passive heatsink (which i beleive was an option by intel to oem's) the cpu ran flawlessly with that cooling, the heasink then went to my piii 700, and my pII 266 is now using the stock heatsink from a pII 400 and the cpu actually runs hotter with the pII 400's active cooling.The last one though was Micron's fault. It was a really crappy government PC from Micron with a passive heatsink of all things
If it helps any I didn't actually own any of them. The 486 was a system that belonged to my best friend in high school. He bought a shiny new retail 75MHz 486DX as an upgrade and at the time the performance rocked ... for a couple of months before the CPU kacked it. The replacement worked for years and years though, so that was cool at least. It must have just been bad luck.Seriously ? I have owned several PC's for 15 years, I've never ever had a cpu failure :/ Just about every other component has failed though, countless motherboards, harddisks, monitors, optical drives, PSU's.. even micebut never a cpu. Oh well, ymvv.
Eh. Never waste an opportunity is my motto. I've got a graveyard of old PCs. Even if I replaced the dead CPU with a faster one at my own cost the spare CPU from the waranty return would still have a home at my house. Hell, I'd probably put together another system just to drop it into. :ONo. Seriously, if a 1 GHz cpu would fail, I wouldnt bother go through the hassle of opening the case, removing HSF, sending it in, waiting for another one, reinstalling it.. could just well use the occasion to insert something much faster that is also as good as free (like $20 for a used XP1500+ or 1400 Tbird). Now if it where a reasonably up to date cpu, that would change things.
The passive heatsink didn't make it crappy. The horrible motherboards and bad hard drives made them crappy.How does a passive heatsink on a PII 266 make it crappy?