and it has such a horrible engine that it artificially makes the game run worse than it should.
games like crysis should not exist... building for future tech and makeing the gpu brute force things just isnt the way it should ever be dont.
ooo eye candy... yay, game must be great... sadly good graphics =/= good game.
...... I have to give you a +1 on that.
i would rather have ps2 level poly counts, and high res textures than be forced to spend 700$ on upgrading my computer so i can see a pretty game.
.......... WRONG....... YOU paid 1500$ for a 50" HD TV that can do 1920x1080p graphic's, BUT have it plugged up to a P O S that makes 1024x768 look good.
i love that consoles "hold graphics back" for two reason, 1, it makes people who have to have the best looking games possible squirm, and two, it already costs to much to make a game, and most of that cost is in the graphics side, id rather games be cheaper than higher than 60$
......WRONG AGAIN...... same time/same cost. But yes it can cost more if you have a game that you coded to work on DX-8/9 Hardware and need it to do Tessellation, GPGPU support, and Geometry Shaders to name a few. As gamers we keep asking for our games to look more realistic. If you LOVE that consoles "hold graphics back" but the game play is lacking ....... Then please go back to playing DOOM 1 because that is where you want to keep us (referring to image quality).
Thank You For Your Time